From: linux@horizon.com
To: jwboyer@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] HOWTO do Linux kernel development
Date: 16 Nov 2005 07:15:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051116121512.22803.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
> What should you not do?
>
> - expect your patch to be accepted without question
> - become defensive
> - ignore comments and resubmit the patch without making any changes
> - explain how your project is funded by XYZ and therefore must be
> awesome as it is
>
> In a community that is looking for the best technical solution
> possible, there will always be differing opinions on how beneficial a
> patch is. You have to be cooperative, and
> willing to adapt your idea to fit within the kernel. Or at least be
> willing to prove your idea is worth it. Remember, being wrong is ok
> as long as you are willing to work toward a solution that is right.
One thing to add is that you do NOT have to be a crowd-pleasing politican
and make every change that some random person on lkml suggests.
Indeed, because you're getting comments from a large group of individuals
and not a single entity, you may get flat-out contradictory feedback.
Obviously, comments from the maintainers of subsystems you're touching
should be accorded significant weight, but you can disagree with Linus
if you have a good enough reason. What you should do is think about the
comments and, if you disagree, explain why your way is better.
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 12:15 linux [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-14 22:07 Greg KH
2005-11-14 22:10 ` Greg KH
2005-11-15 0:18 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2005-11-15 0:32 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-15 4:58 ` Greg KH
2005-11-15 8:37 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-11-15 19:04 ` Greg KH
2005-11-15 0:32 ` Josh Boyer
2005-11-15 1:25 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-15 1:31 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-15 2:16 ` Josh Boyer
2005-11-15 2:42 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-15 2:52 ` Josh Boyer
2005-11-15 3:01 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-15 4:48 ` Greg KH
2005-11-15 4:47 ` Greg KH
2005-11-15 1:08 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-15 4:38 ` Greg KH
2005-11-15 5:51 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-15 5:52 ` Greg KH
2005-11-15 6:31 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-17 13:54 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 14:42 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-15 17:33 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 8:12 ` Michael Kerrisk
2005-11-17 6:56 ` Greg KH
2005-11-17 12:12 ` Michael Kerrisk
2005-11-15 20:10 ` Luca
2005-11-15 20:13 ` Josh Boyer
2005-11-15 20:56 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 4:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-15 22:20 ` sitexec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051116121512.22803.qmail@science.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®