From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:04:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051207170426.GB28414@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512070105.40169.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:05:39AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Monday 05 December 2005 15:27, Russell King wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:23:37PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > The name parameter of platform_device_register_simple should be of
> > > type const char * instead of char *, as we simply pass it to
> > > platform_device_alloc, where it has type const char *.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> >
> > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> >
> > However, I've been wondering whether we want to keep this "simple"
> > interface around long-term given that we now have a more flexible
> > platform device allocation interface - I don't particularly like
> > having superfluous interfaces for folk to get confused with.
>
> Now that you made platform_device_alloc install default release
> handler there is no need to have the _simple interface. I will
> convert input devices (main users of _simple) to the new interface
> and then we can get rid of it.
That sounds like a very good idea.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-07 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-05 20:23 Jean Delvare
2005-12-05 20:27 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 6:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 17:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-12-08 21:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 21:37 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 21:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 23:26 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 17:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:08 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 18:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 19:03 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 22:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 22:51 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 22:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 23:06 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 23:21 ` Russell King
2005-12-08 20:58 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 21:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-08 23:17 ` Russell King
2005-12-08 20:52 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-08 23:22 ` Russell King
2005-12-10 15:49 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-11 19:44 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-12 2:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-07 18:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-12-07 19:05 ` Russell King
2005-12-07 6:50 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-07 9:24 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051207170426.GB28414@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®