mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 3/9] UML - SIGWINCH handling cleanup
@ 2006-01-04 21:51 Jeff Dike
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2006-01-04 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm; +Cc: linux-kernel, user-mode-linux-devel

Code cleanup - unregister_winch and winch_cleanup had some duplicate code.
This is now abstracted out into free_winch.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>

Index: linux-2.6.15/arch/um/drivers/line.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/arch/um/drivers/line.c	2006-01-04 13:57:45.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.15/arch/um/drivers/line.c	2006-01-04 13:58:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -774,55 +774,49 @@ void register_winch_irq(int fd, int tty_
 		printk("register_winch_irq - failed to register IRQ\n");
 }
 
+static void free_winch(struct winch *winch)
+{
+	list_del(&winch->list);
+
+	if(winch->pid != -1)
+		os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
+	if(winch->fd != -1)
+		os_close_file(winch->fd);
+
+	free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
+	kfree(winch);
+}
+
 static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
 	struct list_head *ele;
-	struct winch *winch, *found = NULL;
+	struct winch *winch;
 
 	spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
+
 	list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){
 		winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
                 if(winch->tty == tty){
-                        found = winch;
-                        break;
+			free_winch(winch);
+			break;
                 }
         }
-        if(found == NULL)
-		goto err;
-
-	list_del(&winch->list);
-	spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
-
-        if(winch->pid != -1)
-                os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
-
-        free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
-        kfree(winch);
-
-	return;
-err:
 	spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
 }
 
-/* XXX: No lock as it's an exitcall... is this valid? Depending on cleanup
- * order... are we sure that nothing else is done on the list? */
 static void winch_cleanup(void)
 {
-	struct list_head *ele;
+	struct list_head *ele, *next;
 	struct winch *winch;
 
-	list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){
+	spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
+
+	list_for_each_safe(ele, next, &winch_handlers){
 		winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
-		if(winch->fd != -1){
-			/* Why is this different from the above free_irq(),
-			 * which deactivates SIGIO? This searches the FD
-			 * somewhere else and removes it from the list... */
-			deactivate_fd(winch->fd, WINCH_IRQ);
-			os_close_file(winch->fd);
-		}
-		if(winch->pid != -1)
-			os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
+		free_winch(winch);
 	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
 }
 __uml_exitcall(winch_cleanup);
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-01-04 20:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-04 21:51 [PATCH 3/9] UML - SIGWINCH handling cleanup Jeff Dike

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome