* Use of __init in asus_acpi.c + sony_acpi.c?
@ 2006-02-26 9:42 Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-01 19:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2006-02-26 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: len.brown, LKML, linux-acpi
When running the section mismatch check on latest -mm I see:
WARNING: drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.o - Section mismatch: reference to \
.init.text:asus_hotk_add from .data between 'asus_hotk_driver' (at \
offset 0xe0) and 'model_conf'
WARNING: drivers/acpi/sony_acpi.o - Section mismatch: reference to \
.init.text:sony_acpi_add from .data between 'sony_acpi_driver' (at \
offset 0xe0) and 'sony_acpi_values'
WARNING: drivers/acpi/sony_acpi.o - Section mismatch: reference to \
.exit.text:sony_acpi_remove from .data between 'sony_acpi_driver' (at \
offset 0xe8) and 'sony_acpi_values'
Browsing the source I see that this is assignments to struct acpi_driver
structure:
static struct acpi_driver asus_hotk_driver = {
.name = ACPI_HOTK_NAME,
.class = ACPI_HOTK_CLASS,
.ids = ACPI_HOTK_HID,
.ops = {
.add = asus_hotk_add, <==== __init
.remove = asus_hotk_remove,
},
};
>From browsing the code I cannot see when this happens.
In asus_acpi.c and sony_acpi.c the .add and .remove methods are
declared __init/__exit indicating that the add method is solely used
during early init of the module.
Is it correct that acpi_bus_register_driver() is only called during the
early init phase of a drivers and so we can discard the .add methods
after first usage?
Likewise for .remove that this is only used when a module is unloaded
and so can be discarded when builtin?
Either asus_acpi.c and sony_acpi.c needs updates or the rest of
acpi_driver needs an update (fails to use __init, __exit).
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Use of __init in asus_acpi.c + sony_acpi.c? 2006-02-26 9:42 Use of __init in asus_acpi.c + sony_acpi.c? Sam Ravnborg @ 2006-03-01 19:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2006-03-01 20:51 ` [PATCH] ACPI: remove __init/__exit from Asus and Sony .add()/.remove() methods Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2006-03-01 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: len.brown, LKML, linux-acpi, Karol Kozimor, Julien Lerouge, acpi4asus-user, Stelian Pop On Sunday 26 February 2006 02:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > WARNING: drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.o - Section mismatch: reference to \ > .init.text:asus_hotk_add from .data between 'asus_hotk_driver' (at \ > offset 0xe0) and 'model_conf' > WARNING: drivers/acpi/sony_acpi.o - Section mismatch: reference to \ > .init.text:sony_acpi_add from .data between 'sony_acpi_driver' (at \ > offset 0xe0) and 'sony_acpi_values' > ... > From browsing the code I cannot see when this happens. > In asus_acpi.c and sony_acpi.c the .add and .remove methods are > declared __init/__exit indicating that the add method is solely used > during early init of the module. > > Is it correct that acpi_bus_register_driver() is only called during the > early init phase of a drivers and so we can discard the .add methods > after first usage? I think this is a bug in asus_acpi.c and sony_acpi.c. They assume that their devices can not be hot-plugged, so if they aren't found at the time of acpi_bus_register_driver(), they can discard the .add() methods. It is true that these particular devices can't be hot-plugged, but there's no way to tell that to acpi_bus_register_driver(), so we have to assume .add() could be called as long as the driver remains registered. I'll cook up a patch for asus_acpi.c and sony_acpi.c. Thanks for finding this. Bjorn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ACPI: remove __init/__exit from Asus and Sony .add()/.remove() methods 2006-03-01 19:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas @ 2006-03-01 20:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2006-03-01 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: len.brown, LKML, linux-acpi, Karol Kozimor, Julien Lerouge, acpi4asus-user, Stelian Pop, Andrew Morton Even though the devices claimed by asus_acpi.c and sony_acpi.c can not be hot-plugged, the driver registration infrastructure allows the .add() and .remove() methods to be called at any time while the driver is registered. So remove __init and __exit from them. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Index: work-mm4/drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.c =================================================================== --- work-mm4.orig/drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.c 2006-02-22 09:55:50.000000000 -0700 +++ work-mm4/drivers/acpi/asus_acpi.c 2006-03-01 12:17:50.000000000 -0700 @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ unsigned long count, void *data); static int -__init asus_proc_add(char *name, proc_writefunc * writefunc, +asus_proc_add(char *name, proc_writefunc * writefunc, proc_readfunc * readfunc, mode_t mode, struct acpi_device *device) { @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ return 0; } -static int __init asus_hotk_add_fs(struct acpi_device *device) +static int asus_hotk_add_fs(struct acpi_device *device) { struct proc_dir_entry *proc; mode_t mode; @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ * This function is used to initialize the hotk with right values. In this * method, we can make all the detection we want, and modify the hotk struct */ -static int __init asus_hotk_get_info(void) +static int asus_hotk_get_info(void) { struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; struct acpi_buffer dsdt = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ return AE_OK; } -static int __init asus_hotk_check(void) +static int asus_hotk_check(void) { int result = 0; @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int asus_hotk_found; -static int __init asus_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device) +static int asus_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device) { acpi_status status = AE_OK; int result; Index: work-mm4/drivers/acpi/sony_acpi.c =================================================================== --- work-mm4.orig/drivers/acpi/sony_acpi.c 2006-02-22 09:55:50.000000000 -0700 +++ work-mm4/drivers/acpi/sony_acpi.c 2006-03-01 12:18:24.000000000 -0700 @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ return AE_OK; } -static int __init sony_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device) +static int sony_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device) { acpi_status status; int result; @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ } -static int __exit sony_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type) +static int sony_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type) { acpi_status status; struct sony_acpi_value *item; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-01 20:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-02-26 9:42 Use of __init in asus_acpi.c + sony_acpi.c? Sam Ravnborg 2006-03-01 19:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2006-03-01 20:51 ` [PATCH] ACPI: remove __init/__exit from Asus and Sony .add()/.remove() methods Bjorn Helgaas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®