From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: ashok.raj@intel.com, olel@ans.pl, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
rajesh.shah@intel.com, ak@muc.de
Subject: Re: More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:22:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060313142223.7ac20a65.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060313120552.A25020@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> When CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is turned on we always use physflat mode (bigsmp) even
> when #of CPUs are less than 8 to avoid sending IPI to offline processors.
>
> Without having BIGSMP on it spits out a warning during boot on systems that
> seems misleading, since it complains even on systems that have less
> than 8 cpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> arch/i386/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/arch/i386/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/arch/i386/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/arch/i386/Kconfig
> @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ config PHYSICAL_START
>
> config HOTPLUG_CPU
> bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> - depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER
> + depends on SMP && HOTPLUG && EXPERIMENTAL && !X86_VOYAGER && !X86_PC
> ---help---
> Say Y here to experiment with turning CPUs off and on. CPUs
> can be controlled through /sys/devices/system/cpu.
Still seems wrong. People _do_ use HOTPLUG_CPU on X86_PCs so they can get
software suspend. The number of people who do this are probably 100000x
the number of people who have physically hotpluggable CPUs. And I don't
think we can churn their config requirements this much so late in the game.
So for now I suggest we're best off simply killing the printk (or doing
something smarter, like comparing cpu_online-map with cpu_possible_map
(which isn't right)).
Longer term, it appears that we need to do some Kconfig and C work to
separate out the HOTPLUG_CPU infrastructure which swsusp needs from actual
CPU hotplugging.
What _is_ this IPI problem anyway? Can't send point-to-point IPIs to
offlined CPUs? (Don't do that then?) Or do broadcast IPIs go wrong, or
what?
And does it affect pretend-x86-hotplug, or is it only affecting real hotplug?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-13 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-12 2:04 Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 11:04 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 11:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 13:05 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 15:35 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2006-03-12 21:13 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 19:36 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 20:05 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 22:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-13 23:04 ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-15 5:44 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-03-15 6:18 ` Shaohua Li
2006-03-15 7:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 9:37 ` [PATCH] No need to protect current->group_info in sys_getgroups(), in_group_p() and in_egroup_p() Eric Dumazet
2006-03-20 19:09 ` [PATCH] Use unsigned int types for a faster bsearch Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 5:06 ` [PATCH] Use __read_mostly on some hot fs variables Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 5:15 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-22 6:23 ` [RFC, PATCH] avoid some atomics in open()/close() for monothreaded processes Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-22 6:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22 7:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 18:09 ` More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Ashok Raj
2006-03-15 10:50 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-15 15:44 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060313142223.7ac20a65.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olel@ans.pl \
--cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome