mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: move enough load to balance average load per task
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:47:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060410224709.A28321@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <443B0CF8.6060707@bigpond.net.au>; from pwil3058@bigpond.net.au on Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:57:12AM +1000

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:57:12AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > Can you give an example scenario where this patch helps? And doesn't
> > the normal imabalance calculations capture those issues?
> 
> Yes, I think that the normal imbalance calculations (in 
> find_busiest_queue()) will generally capture the aim of having 
> approximately equal average loads per task on run queues.  But this bit 
> of code is a special case in that the extra aggression being taken by 
> the load balancer (in response to a scenario raised by you) is being 

Can you give a specific example which shows the problem
and which you are trying to fix with this particular patch..

thanks,
suresh

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-11  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-10  6:45 Peter Williams
2006-04-11  1:12 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-11  1:57   ` Peter Williams
2006-04-11  5:47     ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2006-04-11 23:46   ` Peter Williams
2006-04-12  1:57     ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-12  5:06       ` Peter Williams
2006-04-12 16:55         ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-12 23:13           ` Peter Williams
     [not found]         ` <443D95DF.2090807@bigpond.net.au>
2006-04-14  0:31           ` smpnice: issues with finding busiest queue Siddha, Suresh B
2006-04-14  1:17             ` Peter Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060410224709.A28321@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome