From: jos poortvliet <jos@mijnkamer.nl>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [patch][rfc] quell interactive feeding frenzy
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:59:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604191059.33490.jos@mijnkamer.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060419083724.GA7329@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2816 bytes --]
Op woensdag 19 april 2006 10:37, schreef Andreas Mohr:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:08:08AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Monday 17 April 2006 04:44, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:22:59AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > The current value, 6ms at 1000HZ, is chosen because it's the largest
> > > > value that can schedule a task in less than normal human perceptible
> > > > range when two competing heavily cpu bound tasks are the same
> > > > priority. At 250HZ it works out to 7.5ms and 10ms at 100HZ.
> > > > Ironically in my experimenting I found the cpu cache improvements
> > > > become much less significant above 7ms so I'm very happy with this
> > > > compromise.
> > >
> > > Heh, this part is *EXACTLY* a fully sufficient explanation of what I
> > > was wondering about myself just these days ;)
> > > (I'm experimenting with different timeslice values on my P3/450 to
> > > verify what performance impact exactly it has)
> > > However with a measly 256kB cache it probably doesn't matter too much,
> > > I think.
> > >
> > > But I think it's still important to mention that your perception might
> > > be twisted by your P4 limitation (no testing with slower and really
> > > slow machines).
> >
> > You underestimate me. Those cpu cache effects were performance effects
> > measured down to a PII 233, but all were i386 architecture. As for
> > "perception" this isn't my testing I'm talking about; these are
> > neuropsychiatric tests that have nothing to do with pcs or what processor
> > you use ;)
>
> OK, but I was not worrying about the interactivity aspects, rather the
> performance aspects (GUI updates of KDE 3.5.2 on P3/450/256MB on Ubuntu are
> about as slow as medium-hot lava). While of course it's mostly KDE (and
> probably also the S3 Savage driver/card) which is to blame here,
> I'm trying to first do as much as possible at kernel level before
> eventually going higher up the chain...
if it's slow redrawing, i'd blame the video driver or X, not KDE/Qt - tough
you might want to try another style and windowdecoration. plastik is
generally speaking quite fast, or try the 'light' style. Xorg xcomposite
might help too, but i guess your video card won't like that :D
slow app startup will be better in Kubuntu Dapper+1, as they will finally
incorporate the new fontconfig (*g* i hope so) and use GCC's C++ symbol
invisibillity in KDE/Qt. those both can give speedups in the area of 10-20%,
so that should be noticable. KDE 3.5.3 also will also have a few other
patches to speed up the KDE startup process, so - faster login, too.
now with al this, its hard to imagine KDE 4 will again sport some 20/30%
speedup due to reduced memory usage/binary size ;-)
> Andreas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-19 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200604112100.28725.kernel@kolivas.org>
2006-04-11 17:03 ` Fwd: " Al Boldi
2006-04-11 22:56 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-12 5:41 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-12 6:22 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-12 8:17 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-12 9:36 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-12 10:39 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-12 11:27 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-12 15:25 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-13 11:51 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-14 3:16 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-15 7:05 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-15 18:23 ` [ck] " Michael Gerdau
2006-04-15 20:45 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-15 23:22 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-16 18:44 ` [ck] " Andreas Mohr
2006-04-17 0:08 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-19 8:37 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-04-19 8:59 ` jos poortvliet [this message]
2006-04-15 22:32 ` jos poortvliet
2006-04-15 23:06 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-16 6:02 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-16 8:31 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-16 8:58 ` Con Kolivas
2006-04-16 10:37 ` was " Con Kolivas
2006-04-16 19:03 ` Al Boldi
2006-04-16 23:26 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200604191059.33490.jos@mijnkamer.nl \
--to=jos@mijnkamer.nl \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®