From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: David Wilk <davidwilk@gmail.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>,
stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.16.6 breaks java... sort of
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:03:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060426080326.GD9359@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73fyk09ayc.fsf@bragg.suse.de>
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:12:43AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> "David Wilk" <davidwilk@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Ok, I think I need to apologize to everyone here. I have found the
> > problem, and it is not with your patch, Hugh. For some reason, the
> > config for my 2.6.16.7 source tree had a 1G/3G user/kernel split
> > configured. This is very bizaar as I copy my .config from tree to
> > tree to avoid any changes in the configuration of my test kernels.
>
> This just shows this dreaded VMSPLIT config was a bad idea in the first
> place. There was a reason we didn't have it for such a long time (too
> many users get it wrong) and such occurrences just show again that this
> is still true.
>
> IMHO it would be best to just remove that option again and require
> users who really want to change this to patch their kernels again.
>
> At the very least it should be probably made dependent on CONFIG_EMBEDDED.
NAK, EMBEDDED has a different semantics (space savings in memory limited
situations) that does not apply to this option.
> -Andi
>...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-26 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a4403ff60604191152u5a71e70fr9f54c104a654fc99@mail.gmail.com>
2006-04-19 19:28 ` Greg KH
2006-04-19 19:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-04-20 16:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-04-20 17:10 ` David Wilk
2006-04-21 19:08 ` David Wilk
2006-04-21 19:27 ` Chris Wright
2006-04-21 20:43 ` David Wilk
2006-04-21 21:56 ` David Wilk
2006-04-23 12:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-04-24 20:59 ` David Wilk
2006-04-25 17:51 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-04-25 18:08 ` David Wilk
2006-04-25 18:28 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-04-26 5:12 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-26 8:03 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-04-26 21:40 ` David Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060426080326.GD9359@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=davidwilk@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome