From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "Kimball Murray" <kimball.murray@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@digeo.com, kmurray@redhat.com,
natalie.protasevich@unisys.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [(repost) git Patch 1/1] avoid IRQ0 ioapic pin collision
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:17:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604261517.06505.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CFF307C98FEABE47A452B27C06B85BB6466487@hdsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 21:53, Brown, Len wrote:
> I'd rather see the original irq-renaming patch
> and its subsequent multiple via workaround patches
> reverted than to further complicate what is becoming
> a fragile mess.
Sorry rechecking - i already got the patch now. You want me to drop it again?
I guess we could drop it all, but VIA must still work afterwards.
How would we do that?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-26 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-25 19:53 Brown, Len
2006-04-26 12:58 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-04-26 13:17 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-04-26 13:56 ` Kimball Murray
2006-04-26 14:01 ` Kimball Murray
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-09 5:14 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-05-09 4:25 Brown, Len
2006-05-09 3:10 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-05-08 21:51 Brown, Len
2006-05-08 18:37 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-05-06 6:42 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-05-06 6:18 Brown, Len
2006-05-04 16:42 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-05-04 16:04 Brown, Len
2006-05-04 22:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-04 15:33 Brown, Len
2006-05-04 5:07 Brown, Len
2006-05-04 15:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-02 23:52 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-05-02 7:41 Brown, Len
2006-05-02 7:46 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-02 8:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-01 23:21 Brown, Len
2006-05-02 6:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-02 6:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-02 7:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-02 7:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-02 6:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-04-27 20:36 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-04-30 23:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-04-27 19:32 Brown, Len
2006-04-27 19:26 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-04-27 19:10 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-04-27 19:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-27 18:13 Brown, Len
2006-04-27 18:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-26 14:00 Protasevich, Natalie
2006-04-25 16:06 Kimball Murray
2006-04-26 11:27 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200604261517.06505.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=kimball.murray@gmail.com \
--cc=kmurray@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=natalie.protasevich@unisys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome