* [patch 2/2] s390: bug in setup_rt_frame
@ 2006-04-29 8:26 Heiko Carstens
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Heiko Carstens @ 2006-04-29 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, Martin Schwidefsky
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Consider return value of __put_user() when setting up a signal frame instead
of ignoring it.
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
---
Second version of this patch. This time without replacing __NR_rt_sigreturn
with __NR_sigreturn...
arch/s390/kernel/signal.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c b/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
index ae1927e..d48cfc7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/signal.c
@@ -358,8 +358,9 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struc
} else {
regs->gprs[14] = (unsigned long)
frame->retcode | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
- err |= __put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | __NR_rt_sigreturn,
- (u16 __user *)(frame->retcode));
+ if (__put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | __NR_rt_sigreturn,
+ (u16 __user *)(frame->retcode)))
+ goto give_sigsegv;
}
/* Set up backchain. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-04-29 8:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-29 8:26 [patch 2/2] s390: bug in setup_rt_frame Heiko Carstens
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome