mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "Martin Bligh" <mbligh@google.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	apw@shadowen.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:38:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200605030938.37967.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4458730F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>

On Wednesday 03 May 2006 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> ><EOE>new stack 0 (0 0 0 10082 10)
> >> 
> >> Looks like <rubbish> <SS> <RSP> <RFLAGS> <CS> to me, ...
> >
> >Hmm, right.
> > 
> >> >Hmm weird. There isn't anything resembling an exception frame at the top of the
> >> >stack.  No idea how this could happen.
> >> 
> >> ... which is a valid frame where the stack pointer was corrupted before the exception occurred. One more printed
> item
> >> (or rather, starting items at estack_end[-1]) would allow at least seeing what RIP this came from.
> >
> >Any can you add that please and check? 
> ???

Sorry I meant to write Andy but left out the d :-( - he did the testing
on the machine that showed the problem.

> 

> 
> >Also worst case one could dump last branch pointers. AMD unfortunately only has four,
> >on Intel with 16 it's easier.
> 
> Provided you disable recording early enough. Otherwise only one (last exception from/to) is going to be useful on
> both.

i usually just saved them as first thing in the exception entry point.

> >That can cause recursive exceptions. I'm a bit paranoid with that.
> 
> Without doing so it can also cause recursive exceptions, just that this is going to be deadly then.

Hmm point.

-Andi

 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-03  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4450F5AD.9030200@google.com>
2006-04-28  8:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-05-01 14:24   ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2006-05-01 17:07     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-05-01 17:14       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:19       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:26         ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:55           ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:57             ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 18:32               ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-01 23:29                 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:32       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-02 20:20         ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 18:34     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-02 13:20       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-02 20:00       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-02 20:09         ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-03  6:47           ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03  6:49             ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-03  7:08               ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03  7:38                 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-05-03  8:12                   ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-03  8:25                     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03 19:26               ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-04  7:40                 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-04 16:28                 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-04  6:22 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Chuck Ebbert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-03  5:37 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Chuck Ebbert
2006-04-27 16:54 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-04-27  8:41 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 10:16 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-04-27 19:19   ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 19:26     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-04-27 21:41     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Grant Coady
2006-04-27 21:50       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-27 22:16         ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 10:27 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 13:07   ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:28     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 15:32       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 20:53         ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 22:09           ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:26   ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 15:43     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:47 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Matthieu CASTET
2006-04-27 18:02   ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal
2006-04-27 23:24     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-28 14:40       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal
2006-04-28 16:07     ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 matthieu castet
2006-04-28 18:05       ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200605030938.37967.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome