From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 09:12:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <445865F7.1010208@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605030938.37967.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 May 2006 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>>>>><EOE>new stack 0 (0 0 0 10082 10)
>>>>
>>>>Looks like <rubbish> <SS> <RSP> <RFLAGS> <CS> to me, ...
>>>
>>>Hmm, right.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Hmm weird. There isn't anything resembling an exception frame at the top of the
>>>>>stack. No idea how this could happen.
>>>>
>>>>... which is a valid frame where the stack pointer was corrupted before the exception occurred. One more printed
>>
>>item
>>
>>>>(or rather, starting items at estack_end[-1]) would allow at least seeing what RIP this came from.
>>>
>>>Any can you add that please and check?
>>
>>???
>
>
> Sorry I meant to write Andy but left out the d :-( - he did the testing
> on the machine that showed the problem.
Heh, happy to do the testing. Just to make sure I am doing the right
thing, you want an entire stack frame dropped out in the case that
SS/RSP are 0; so we get the RIP.
-apw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-03 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4450F5AD.9030200@google.com>
2006-04-28 8:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-05-01 14:24 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2006-05-01 17:07 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-05-01 17:14 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:19 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 17:55 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:57 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 18:32 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-01 23:29 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Badari Pulavarty
2006-05-01 17:32 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-02 20:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-01 18:34 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-02 13:20 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-02 20:00 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-05-02 20:09 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-03 6:47 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03 6:49 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-03 7:08 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03 7:38 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-05-03 8:12 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2006-05-03 8:25 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Jan Beulich
2006-05-03 19:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-04 7:40 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-04 16:28 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andy Whitcroft
2006-05-04 6:22 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Chuck Ebbert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-03 5:37 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Chuck Ebbert
2006-04-27 16:54 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Martin Bligh
2006-04-27 8:41 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 10:16 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-04-27 19:19 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 19:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andi Kleen
2006-04-27 21:41 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Grant Coady
2006-04-27 21:50 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Randy.Dunlap
2006-04-27 22:16 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 10:27 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 13:07 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:28 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 15:32 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 20:53 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 22:09 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:26 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-27 15:43 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-04-27 15:47 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Matthieu CASTET
2006-04-27 18:02 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal
2006-04-27 23:24 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Greg KH
2006-04-28 14:40 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal
2006-04-28 16:07 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 matthieu castet
2006-04-28 18:05 ` 2.6.17-rc2-mm1 Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=445865F7.1010208@shadowen.org \
--to=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome