Any reasons not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?

Any reasons not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?

[Maciej Soltysiak]

Hi,

My debian testing has gcc-4.0.3 and gcc-4.1.0 available.
I am using gcc-4.0.3 to compile the kernel but I was wondering if
there is a reason not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?

The computer is stable, no problems with compiling the kernel
with gcc-4.0.3.

Does anyone has good or bad experience and thus advice on it?

Best Regards,
Maciej

Re: Any reasons not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?

[Ismail Donmez]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --]

Perşembe 4 May 2006 13:10 tarihinde, Maciej Soltysiak şunları yazmıştı: 
> Hi,
>
> My debian testing has gcc-4.0.3 and gcc-4.1.0 available.
> I am using gcc-4.0.3 to compile the kernel but I was wondering if
> there is a reason not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?
>
> The computer is stable, no problems with compiling the kernel
> with gcc-4.0.3.
>
> Does anyone has good or bad experience and thus advice on it?

Well gcc bugzilla says : "155 regressions in 4.0 , 128 regressions in 4.1" , 
that alone is a good reason to use 4.1 imho.

Regards,
ismail
-- 


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]