mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 15:12:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060612131209.GB17463@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0606121446130.7129@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>


* Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI> wrote:

> > >   - arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:
> > >     False positive because res pointer is stored in a global instance of
> > >     struct resource.
> > 
> > there's no good way around this one but to annotate it in one way or 
> > another.
> 
> Scanning bss and data sections is too expensive, I guess.  I would 
> prefer we create a separate section for gc roots but what you're 
> suggesting is ok as well.

kmemleak does scan global data sections. I dont know why we dont 
discover this particular pointer though: the resource pointer ought to 
be accessible via the iomem_resource.parent/sibling/child sorted list. 
Hm.

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-12 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-11 11:18 [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 0/9] Kernel memory leak detector 0.7 Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 1/9] Base support for kmemleak Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13 11:14   ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-13 12:47     ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 2/9] Some documentation " Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 3/9] Add the memory allocation/freeing hooks " Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 4/9] Modules support " Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 5/9] Add kmemleak support for i386 Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 6/9] Add kmemleak support for ARM Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:21 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12  5:19   ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-12  8:11     ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12  8:17       ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-12  8:43         ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 10:53         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 11:08           ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-12 11:36             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 11:56               ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-12 12:53                 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 13:12                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-06-12 14:38                   ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 22:29                   ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 12:56           ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12 19:22             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 22:24               ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13  5:53               ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-13  6:59                 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13  7:57                   ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-13  9:45                     ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13 10:04                       ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-13 10:37                         ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-13  7:26                 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-13  8:11                   ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-06-13 10:49                   ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-14  4:07                     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-14  5:46                       ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-14  5:53                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-06-14 12:03                         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-14 13:46                           ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-14 13:35                         ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-14 13:21                       ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-12  9:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-06-12  9:35         ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-24 10:20     ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-24 10:22       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-24 10:55         ` Catalin Marinas
2006-07-24 11:15         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-24 13:28           ` Catalin Marinas
2006-08-03  6:32             ` Jakub Jelinek
2006-08-03  8:31               ` Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:22 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 8/9] Simple testing for kmemleak Catalin Marinas
2006-06-11 11:22 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 9/9] Keep the __init functions after initialization Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060612131209.GB17463@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®