From: Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC -mm] more cpu_relax() places?
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:37:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060612183743.GA28610@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> (raw)
Hi all,
while reviewing 2.6.17-rc6-mm1, I found some places that might
want to make use of cpu_relax() in order to not block secondary
pipelines while busy-polling (probably especially useful on SMT CPUs):
arch/i386/kernel/smp.c/flush_tlb_others():
while (!cpus_empty(flush_cpumask))
/* nothing. lockup detection does not belong here */
mb();
should probably be made
while (!cpus_empty(flush_cpumask)) {
cpu_relax();
/* nothing. lockup detection does not belong here */
mb();
}
(to have memory barrier directly before flush_cpumask is read).
Second,
include/asm-i386/apic.h/apic_wait_icr_idle() does use cpu_relax(),
but the version in asm-x86_64/ NOT!
Is this because there's not much use doing cpu_relax() on SMP non-SMT
machines, and x86_64 are always non-SMT? Or rather because someone
screwed up?
And what about include/asm-i386/acpi.h/__acpi_acquire/release_global_lock()?
static inline int
__acpi_acquire_global_lock (unsigned int *lock)
{
unsigned int old, new, val;
do {
old = *lock;
new = (((old & ~0x3) + 2) + ((old >> 1) & 0x1));
val = cmpxchg(lock, old, new);
} while (unlikely (val != old));
return (new < 3) ? -1 : 0;
}
could probably be made
static inline int
__acpi_acquire_global_lock (unsigned int *lock)
{
unsigned int old, new, val;
while (1) {
old = *lock;
new = (((old & ~0x3) + 2) + ((old >> 1) & 0x1));
val = cmpxchg(lock, old, new);
if (likely(val == old))
break;
cpu_relax();
}
return (new < 3) ? -1 : 0;
}
Andreas Mohr
next reply other threads:[~2006-06-12 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-12 18:37 Andreas Mohr [this message]
2006-06-13 19:53 ` [PATCH -mm] i386: cpu_relax() smp.c (was: [RFC -mm] more cpu_relax() places?) Andreas Mohr
2006-06-14 2:10 ` [PATCH -mm] i386: cpu_relax() smp.c Nick Piggin
2006-06-14 19:32 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-06-13 19:54 ` [PATCH -mm] ACPI lock: cpu_relax() (was: [RFC -mm] more cpu_relax() places?) Andreas Mohr
2006-06-14 19:29 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-06-13 19:54 ` [PATCH -mm] x86_64 apic.h " Andreas Mohr
2006-06-14 5:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-06-14 20:28 ` [PATCH -mm] i386: add cpu_relax() to cmos_lock() Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060612183743.GA28610@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
--to=andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®