From: Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm] x86_64 apic.h cpu_relax() (was: [RFC -mm] more cpu_relax() places?)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:54:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060613195430.GC24167@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060612183743.GA28610@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
Hi all,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:37:43PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> while reviewing 2.6.17-rc6-mm1, I found some places that might
> want to make use of cpu_relax() in order to not block secondary
> pipelines while busy-polling (probably especially useful on SMT CPUs):
Patch no. 3 of 3.
This one is adding a cpu_relax() that already existed in the i386 version.
Any reason this wasn't there, too?
Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
diff -urN linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.orig/include/asm-x86_64/apic.h linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.my/include/asm-x86_64/apic.h
--- linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.orig/include/asm-x86_64/apic.h 2006-06-13 19:28:16.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.my/include/asm-x86_64/apic.h 2006-06-13 19:34:08.000000000 +0200
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@
static __inline__ void apic_wait_icr_idle(void)
{
- while ( apic_read( APIC_ICR ) & APIC_ICR_BUSY );
+ while ( apic_read( APIC_ICR ) & APIC_ICR_BUSY )
+ cpu_relax();
}
static inline void ack_APIC_irq(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-13 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-12 18:37 [RFC -mm] more cpu_relax() places? Andreas Mohr
2006-06-13 19:53 ` [PATCH -mm] i386: cpu_relax() smp.c (was: [RFC -mm] more cpu_relax() places?) Andreas Mohr
2006-06-14 2:10 ` [PATCH -mm] i386: cpu_relax() smp.c Nick Piggin
2006-06-14 19:32 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-06-13 19:54 ` [PATCH -mm] ACPI lock: cpu_relax() (was: [RFC -mm] more cpu_relax() places?) Andreas Mohr
2006-06-14 19:29 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-06-13 19:54 ` Andreas Mohr [this message]
2006-06-14 5:34 ` [PATCH -mm] x86_64 apic.h " Andi Kleen
2007-06-14 20:28 ` [PATCH -mm] i386: add cpu_relax() to cmos_lock() Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060613195430.GC24167@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
--to=andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®