From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, swhiteho@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
teigland@redhat.com, pcaulfie@redhat.com, kanderso@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 02:23:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060627022335.8c238772.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060627090408.GA2382@elte.hu>
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:04:08 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > It's a general problem - our reviewing resources do not have the
> > capacity to cover our coding resources. This is especially the case
> > on filesystems. We'd have merged (a very different) reiser4 a year
> > ago if things were in balance.
>
> and just this very minute what gets merged upstream? A chunk of OCFS2
oh yes, running a git tree is a wonderful way to avoid code review.
We ought to require that people get each diff onto a useful mailing list
for review before sending them upstream. And not in batches of 100 five
minutes before sending the pull request.
oh, and we ought to require that people send patches upstream more than
fifteen minutes after they wrote them.
<starts to calm down>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-27 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-20 12:17 Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 12:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 12:47 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 14:04 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 15:40 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 11:20 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-26 21:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-20 12:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-20 12:55 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-20 15:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-23 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-26 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-26 20:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-27 7:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 6:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-27 7:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 7:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 8:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-27 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 9:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-07-03 13:40 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-27 8:16 ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-27 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 8:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-06-27 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 8:42 ` Nathan Scott
2006-06-27 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-23 14:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 15:54 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 15:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 16:09 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 14:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 15:26 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-23 16:29 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-06-23 16:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-26 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-27 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-27 8:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060627022335.8c238772.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kanderso@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pcaulfie@redhat.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®