From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@swsoft.com>,
dlezcano@fr.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, serue@us.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com,
clg@fr.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
herbert@13thfloor.at, devel@openvz.org, sam@vilain.net,
viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 1/4] Network namespaces: cleanup of dev_base list use
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:26:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060627152633.GF24045@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44A149F5.2060204@sw.ru>
Quoting Kirill Korotaev (dev@sw.ru):
> >>>>Cleanup of dev_base list use, with the aim to make device list
> >>>>per-namespace.
> >>>>In almost every occasion, use of dev_base variable and dev->next pointer
> >>>>could be easily replaced by for_each_netdev loop.
> >>>>A few most complicated places were converted to using
> >>>>first_netdev()/next_netdev().
> >>>
> >>>As a proof of concept patch this is ok.
> >>>As a real world patch this is much too big, which prevents review.
> >>>Plus it takes a few actions that are more than replace just
> >>>iterators through the device list.
> >>
> >>Mmm, actually it is a whole changeset and should go as a one patch. I
> >>didn't
> >>find it to be big and my review took only 5-10mins..
> >>I also don't think that mailing each driver maintainer is a good idea.
> >>Only if we want to make some buzz :)
> >
> >
> >Thanks for supporting my case. You reviewed it and missed the obvious
> >typo.
> >I do agree that a patchset doing it all should happen at once.
> This doesn't support anything. e.g. I caught quite a lot of bugs after
> Ingo Molnar, but this doesn't make his code "poor". People are people.
Exactly - people are people, and they will do a better review of a
well-constructed set of small patches than of one large patch. Eyes
glaze over, it just happens.
-serge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-27 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-26 9:49 [patch " Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 9:52 ` [patch 2/4] " Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 9:54 ` [patch 3/4] Network namespaces: IPv4 FIB/routing in namespaces Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 9:55 ` [patch 4/4] Network namespaces: playing and debugging Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 15:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-06-26 15:43 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 17:29 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-06-26 19:34 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 14:56 ` [patch 3/4] Network namespaces: IPv4 FIB/routing in namespaces Daniel Lezcano
2006-06-26 15:46 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 15:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-06-26 19:39 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 20:05 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-06-27 9:25 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-28 13:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-06-28 14:19 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-06-28 14:30 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-28 14:34 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-28 16:56 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-06-28 17:10 ` Ben Greear
2006-06-28 15:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 15:13 ` [RFC][patch 1/4] Network namespaces: cleanup of dev_base list use Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 15:42 ` [patch " Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 16:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-26 20:14 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-26 21:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-27 6:59 ` [RFC][patch " Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-27 11:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-27 15:08 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-06-27 15:26 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2006-06-27 16:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-27 17:20 ` [RFC] Network namespaces a path to mergable code Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-27 17:58 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-27 22:20 ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-28 4:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 5:59 ` Abdallah Chatila
2006-06-28 6:19 ` Sam Vilain
2006-06-28 6:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 9:54 ` Cedric Le Goater
2006-06-28 14:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 14:15 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-28 14:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 4:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 11:06 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-28 16:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 17:22 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-28 17:40 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-06-28 17:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 18:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 18:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-28 18:51 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-06-28 21:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-06-28 22:54 ` James Morris
2006-06-29 0:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-29 0:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-29 9:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-06-28 10:20 ` [RFC] " Cedric Le Goater
2006-06-28 15:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060627152633.GF24045@sergelap.austin.ibm.com \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@vilain.net \
--cc=saw@swsoft.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®