From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@gmail.com>
To: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: jensmh@gmx.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
trivial@kernel.org, Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove duplicate cleanups
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:06:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060629160611.73a90bf2@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606291435.39879.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:35:39 +0100
Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> Actually the context made me think otherwise, look:
>
> "Otherwise, statistics (average think time, average seek distance) on **the**
> process that submitted the just completed.."
"the process" and "that process" are in two different periods, doesn't
it matter?
Otherwise,
statistics (average think time, average seek distance) on **the process**
that submitted the just completed request are examined**.** If it seems
-likely that **that process** will submit another request soon, and that
In the second period "that process" refers clearly to "the process"
defined in the first period, while "process" looks pretty generic.
No?
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.17.1 on x86_64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-29 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-29 11:40 Paolo Ornati
2006-06-29 11:43 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-06-29 11:51 ` jensmh
2006-06-29 11:58 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-06-29 12:35 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-06-29 12:02 ` jensmh
2006-06-29 12:12 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-06-29 12:39 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-06-29 13:05 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-06-29 13:35 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-06-29 14:06 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2006-06-29 13:11 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-06-29 13:48 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060629160611.73a90bf2@localhost \
--to=ornati@gmail.com \
--cc=jensmh@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®