mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: ltuikov@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched.h: increment TASK_COMM_LEN to 20 bytes
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:53:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060630215312.b1389820.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44A5FE17.1000607@garzik.org>

On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:46:15 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> We do occasionally hit task_struct.comm[] truncation, when people use
> >>> "too-long-a-name%d" for their kernel thread names.  But we seem to manage.
> >> It would be especially helpful if you want to name a task thread
> >> the NAA IEEE Registered name format (16 chars, globally unique), for things
> >> like FC, SAS, etc.  This way you can identify the task thread with
> >> the device bearing the NAA IEEE name.
> >>
> >> Currently just last character is cut off, since TASK_COMM_LEN is 15+1.
> >>
> >> I think incrementing it would be a good thing, plus other things
> >> may want to represent 8 bytes as a character array to be the name
> >> of a task thread.
> > 
> > OK, that's a reason.  Being able to map a kernel thread onto a particular
> > device is useful.
> 
> But will it wind up this way, when the does-not-exist-yet-upstream code 
> appears?
> 
> I would think it would make more sense to increase the size of the key 
> task structure only when there are justified, merged users in the kernel.
> 

Well yes - I assumed that would be happening fairly soon.  Luben?

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-01  4:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-01  1:06 Luben Tuikov
2006-07-01  1:19 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01  1:26   ` Luben Tuikov
2006-07-01  1:37     ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-01  2:48       ` Luben Tuikov
2006-07-01  4:46       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-01  4:53         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-07-07 17:00           ` Luben Tuikov
2006-07-07 17:10             ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-09  0:48               ` Luben Tuikov
2006-07-01  9:01       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-03 12:07   ` Jan Engelhardt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-24  2:27 Albert Cahalan
2006-06-23 16:49 Luben Tuikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060630215312.b1389820.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltuikov@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®