From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: remove cpu hotplug bustification in cpufreq.
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:21:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607242023_MC3-1-C5FE-CADB@compuserve.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1153738326.3043.13.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:52:05 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > What kind of _crap_ is this cpufreq thing?
>
> this is why lockdep got highly upset with it, and why Davej proposed to
> remove the locking entirely for now until it can be put back in a
> correct way....
I thought just the 'ondemand' governor was a problem?
That thing has been broken since day 1 AFAICT. There are lots of
reports of problems with it on the list.
--
Chuck
next reply other threads:[~2006-07-25 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-25 0:21 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2006-07-25 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-25 15:06 ` Erik Mouw
2006-07-25 18:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-25 19:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-25 20:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-26 13:40 ` [patch] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizare Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 15:51 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-26 17:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-26 19:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-26 20:58 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-07-26 21:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-26 21:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-27 1:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-27 17:38 ` Ashok Raj
2006-07-29 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-26 21:15 ` Ashok Raj
2006-07-27 19:29 ` Langsdorf, Mark
2006-07-28 13:50 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-28 17:09 ` Langsdorf, Mark
2006-07-26 20:42 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-07-26 21:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-26 21:21 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-07-26 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-26 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-26 22:35 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-07-26 22:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-25 20:46 ` remove cpu hotplug bustification in cpufreq Dave Jones
2006-07-25 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-26 17:12 ` Russell King
2006-07-26 17:53 ` Dave Jones
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-22 19:40 Dave Jones
2006-07-23 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-23 1:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-23 1:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-23 4:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-23 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-23 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-23 18:34 ` Patrick McFarland
2006-07-24 10:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-23 5:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-23 8:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-23 16:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200607242023_MC3-1-C5FE-CADB@compuserve.com \
--to=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome