From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for review] [140/145] i386: mark cpu_dev structures as __cpuinitdata
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:46:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608150249_MC3-1-C823-B57B@compuserve.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1155518783.5764.10.camel@localhost>
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:26:23 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > > The different cpu_dev structures are all used from __cpuinit callers what
> > > I can tell. So mark them as __cpuinitdata instead of __initdata. I am a
> > > little bit unsure about arch/i386/common.c:default_cpu, especially when it
> > > comes to the purpose of this_cpu.
> >
> > But none of these CPUs supports hotplug and only one (AMD) does SMP.
> > So this is just wasting space in the kernel at runtime.
>
> How could this be wasting space? If you compile with CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> disabled then __cpuinitdata will become __initdata - ie the same as
> before. Not a single byte wasted what I can tell.
I was talking about wasted space with HOTPLUG_CPU enabled, of course.
Nobody is ever going to hotplug a VIA, Cyrix, Geode, etc. CPU, yet your
patch makes the kernel carry that code and data anyway.
Yes, the checking scripts will complain. But we know it's OK.
--
Chuck
next reply other threads:[~2006-08-15 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-15 6:46 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2006-08-15 7:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-15 16:59 ` Dave Jones
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-11 15:24 Chuck Ebbert
2006-08-11 16:07 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-14 1:26 ` Magnus Damm
[not found] <20060810 935.775038000@suse.de>
2006-08-10 19:37 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608150249_MC3-1-C823-B57B@compuserve.com \
--to=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome