From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc5] PCI: sort device lists breadth-first
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:11:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060909121134.GC4277@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450283D5.1020404@garzik.org>
Hi!
> I wanted to note what Martin Mares just raised in the
> thread "State of the Linux PCI Subsystem for 2.6.18-rc6":
>
> >Changing the device order in the middle of the 2.6
> >cycle doesn't sound
> >like a sane idea to me. Many people have changed their
> >systems' configuration
> >to adapt to the 2.6 ordering and this patch would break
> >their setups.
> >I have seen many such examples in my vicinity.
> >
> >I believe that not breaking existing 2.6 setups is much
> >more important
> >than keeping compatibility with 2.4 kernels, especially
> >when the problem
> >is discovered after more than 2 years after release of
> >the first 2.6.
>
>
> I'm not siding with either Martin or Matt explicitly,
> just noting that there are good arguments for both sides.
I agree with martin here. 'Lets break all the machines where people
are currently using 2.6.x, for benefit of people currently running
2.4.x' is *very* bad idea.
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-10 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-08 3:14 Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 15:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-08 16:18 ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 16:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-11 19:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-09-12 3:08 ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-12 21:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-09-08 16:45 ` Greg KH
2006-09-08 18:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-08 18:52 ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 18:59 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-09-09 9:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-09 12:11 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-09-10 11:26 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-10 13:02 ` Greg KH
2006-09-15 3:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2006-09-15 13:02 ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-16 2:39 ` Dan Carpenter
2006-09-08 3:18 Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 19:34 Matt Domsch
2006-09-09 14:37 Ragnar Kjørstad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060909121134.GC4277@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome