mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc5] PCI: sort device lists breadth-first
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:11:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060909121134.GC4277@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450283D5.1020404@garzik.org>

Hi!

> I wanted to note what Martin Mares just raised in the 
> thread "State of the Linux PCI Subsystem for 2.6.18-rc6":
> 
> >Changing the device order in the middle of the 2.6 
> >cycle doesn't sound
> >like a sane idea to me. Many people have changed their 
> >systems' configuration
> >to adapt to the 2.6 ordering and this patch would break 
> >their setups.
> >I have seen many such examples in my vicinity.
> >
> >I believe that not breaking existing 2.6 setups is much 
> >more important
> >than keeping compatibility with 2.4 kernels, especially 
> >when the problem
> >is discovered after more than 2 years after release of 
> >the first 2.6.
> 
> 
> I'm not siding with either Martin or Matt explicitly, 
> just noting that there are good arguments for both sides.

I agree with martin here. 'Lets break all the machines where people
are currently using 2.6.x, for benefit of people currently running
2.4.x' is *very* bad idea.
							Pavel
-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-10  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-08  3:14 Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 15:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-08 16:18   ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 16:55     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-11 19:36       ` Bill Davidsen
2006-09-12  3:08         ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-12 21:06           ` Bill Davidsen
2006-09-08 16:45   ` Greg KH
2006-09-08 18:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-08 18:52   ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 18:59   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-09-09  9:05   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-09 12:11     ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-09-10 11:26       ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-10 13:02     ` Greg KH
2006-09-15  3:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2006-09-15 13:02   ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-16  2:39     ` Dan Carpenter
2006-09-08  3:18 Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 19:34 Matt Domsch
2006-09-09 14:37 Ragnar Kjørstad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060909121134.GC4277@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome