mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	ALSA development <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>,
	Castet Matthieu <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver core: Don't ignore bus_attach_device() retval
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:30:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061012113047.1df2a9c8@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0610111036290.5690-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:49:36 -0400 (EDT),
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:

> You know, I'm not so sure device registration should fail when 
> bus_attach_device() returns an error.

Hm, let's see why bus_attach_device() might fail:

* device_bind_driver() failed to create some symlinks. We may
consider not to fail in this case, since sysfs_remove_link() is fine
even for non-existing links.

* probing failed for one possible driver with something other than
-ENODEV or -ENXIO. Not sure if we really should abort in this case.
We'd just end up with an unbound device, and a driver returning (for
example) -ENOMEM for probing may just be a really dumb driver trying to
allocate an insane amount of memory (and the next driver might just be
fine).

> Furthermore there are subtle problems that can arise.  In effect, the
> device is registered for a brief time (while the driver is probed) and
> then unregistered without giving the bus subsystem a chance to prepare for
> the removal.  With USB this can lead to problems; if the driver called
> usb_set_interface() then child devices would be created below the one
> being probed -- and they would never get removed.

One way to fix this would be to make device_bind_driver() always
succeed (even without symlinks), the other to call the ->remove
function if device_bind_driver() fails (assuming that the ->remove
method should undo the stuff done in ->probe).

> In fact, we might want to separate driver probing from device_add()  
> entirely.  That is, make them available as two separate function calls.  
> That way the subsystem driver will have a chance to create attribute files
> before a uevent is generated and a driver is loaded.  (That should help
> udev to work better.)  This would require a larger change, though --
> probably requiring an alternate version of device_add().

Shouldn't subsystems that need attributes early just use dev->groups,
class->dev_attrs or bus->dev_attrs? These attribute groups are added
before the uevent is generated.

-- 
Cornelia Huck
Linux for zSeries Developer
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4837, Mail: cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-12  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-04 20:22 [PATCH] ALSA: fix kernel panic in initialization of mpu401 driver Jiri Kosina
2006-10-05  8:07 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2006-10-05  9:57   ` Jiri Kosina
2006-10-05 14:02   ` Alan Stern
2006-10-05 14:16     ` Jaroslav Kysela
2006-10-05 17:58       ` Greg KH
2006-10-05 21:03         ` [PATCH] Driver core: Don't ignore error returns from probing Alan Stern
2006-10-06  7:53           ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-06  7:57             ` [PATCH] driver core: bus_attach_device() retval check Cornelia Huck
2006-10-06  9:41             ` [Alsa-devel] [PATCH] Driver core: Don't ignore error returns from probing Jaroslav Kysela
2006-10-06 11:14               ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-06 11:46                 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2006-10-06 18:12                 ` Alan Stern
2006-10-09 11:10                   ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-09 11:14                   ` [PATCH] Driver core: Don't ignore bus_attach_device() retval Cornelia Huck
2006-10-09 14:10                     ` Alan Stern
2006-10-11 14:49                     ` Alan Stern
2006-10-12  9:30                       ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2006-10-12 15:59                         ` Alan Stern
2006-10-12 17:17                           ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-12 21:41                             ` Alan Stern
2006-10-13  6:37                               ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061012113047.1df2a9c8@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
    --to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jikos@jikos.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@suse.cz \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®