From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
ALSA development <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>,
Castet Matthieu <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver core: Don't ignore bus_attach_device() retval
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:30:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061012113047.1df2a9c8@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0610111036290.5690-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:49:36 -0400 (EDT),
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> You know, I'm not so sure device registration should fail when
> bus_attach_device() returns an error.
Hm, let's see why bus_attach_device() might fail:
* device_bind_driver() failed to create some symlinks. We may
consider not to fail in this case, since sysfs_remove_link() is fine
even for non-existing links.
* probing failed for one possible driver with something other than
-ENODEV or -ENXIO. Not sure if we really should abort in this case.
We'd just end up with an unbound device, and a driver returning (for
example) -ENOMEM for probing may just be a really dumb driver trying to
allocate an insane amount of memory (and the next driver might just be
fine).
> Furthermore there are subtle problems that can arise. In effect, the
> device is registered for a brief time (while the driver is probed) and
> then unregistered without giving the bus subsystem a chance to prepare for
> the removal. With USB this can lead to problems; if the driver called
> usb_set_interface() then child devices would be created below the one
> being probed -- and they would never get removed.
One way to fix this would be to make device_bind_driver() always
succeed (even without symlinks), the other to call the ->remove
function if device_bind_driver() fails (assuming that the ->remove
method should undo the stuff done in ->probe).
> In fact, we might want to separate driver probing from device_add()
> entirely. That is, make them available as two separate function calls.
> That way the subsystem driver will have a chance to create attribute files
> before a uevent is generated and a driver is loaded. (That should help
> udev to work better.) This would require a larger change, though --
> probably requiring an alternate version of device_add().
Shouldn't subsystems that need attributes early just use dev->groups,
class->dev_attrs or bus->dev_attrs? These attribute groups are added
before the uevent is generated.
--
Cornelia Huck
Linux for zSeries Developer
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4837, Mail: cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-12 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-04 20:22 [PATCH] ALSA: fix kernel panic in initialization of mpu401 driver Jiri Kosina
2006-10-05 8:07 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2006-10-05 9:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2006-10-05 14:02 ` Alan Stern
2006-10-05 14:16 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2006-10-05 17:58 ` Greg KH
2006-10-05 21:03 ` [PATCH] Driver core: Don't ignore error returns from probing Alan Stern
2006-10-06 7:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-06 7:57 ` [PATCH] driver core: bus_attach_device() retval check Cornelia Huck
2006-10-06 9:41 ` [Alsa-devel] [PATCH] Driver core: Don't ignore error returns from probing Jaroslav Kysela
2006-10-06 11:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-06 11:46 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2006-10-06 18:12 ` Alan Stern
2006-10-09 11:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-09 11:14 ` [PATCH] Driver core: Don't ignore bus_attach_device() retval Cornelia Huck
2006-10-09 14:10 ` Alan Stern
2006-10-11 14:49 ` Alan Stern
2006-10-12 9:30 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2006-10-12 15:59 ` Alan Stern
2006-10-12 17:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2006-10-12 21:41 ` Alan Stern
2006-10-13 6:37 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061012113047.1df2a9c8@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jikos@jikos.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®