From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ralf@linux-mips.org, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Fix COW D-cache aliasing on fork
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061020.125851.115909797.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610201251440.3962@g5.osdl.org>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
> Well, sparc always was crud. I can see the missing tlb entry, but if it's
> been turned read-only, the write-back should still work (it clearly _was_
> writable when the write that dirtied the cacheline happened).
I did some more digging, here's what I think the hardware actually
does:
1) On L2 cacheline load, the "user" and "writable" protection
bits are propagated from the TLB entry into the L2 cache
line. Access checks are done on L2 cache hit using this
cached copy of the two protection bits.
2) On L2 dirty cacheline writeback, the physical address is
obtained from the TLB
So what you guys are suggesting should probably work fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-20 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-19 16:35 Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] Pass vma argument to copy_user_highpage() Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: Fix COW D-cache aliasing on fork Ralf Baechle
2006-10-22 2:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 17:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Nick Piggin
2006-10-19 18:13 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 18:48 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-19 22:59 ` David Miller
2006-10-20 14:39 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 15:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 15:57 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 16:47 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 17:37 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-21 0:46 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-20 19:36 ` David Miller
2006-10-20 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 19:58 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-10-20 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 20:59 ` Russell King
2006-10-20 21:06 ` David Miller
2006-10-20 21:17 ` Russell King
2006-10-20 21:30 ` David Miller
2006-10-20 21:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 21:28 ` Russell King
2006-10-20 21:41 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-21 16:28 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-10-20 21:49 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-20 22:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 22:22 ` David Miller
2006-10-20 22:51 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-20 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21 0:06 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-21 0:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21 1:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-21 2:11 ` David Miller
2006-10-21 2:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21 2:46 ` David Miller
2006-10-21 18:27 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-22 1:34 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-12-02 9:49 ` Russell King
2006-10-23 8:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-10-20 16:05 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-20 16:30 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 19:23 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061020.125851.115909797.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®