mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, akpm@osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Fix COW D-cache aliasing on fork
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:22:47 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061020.152247.111203913.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610201500040.3962@g5.osdl.org>

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:02:39 -0700 (PDT)

> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > When I delete the call (not part of my patchset) it means 12% faster 
> > fork.  But I'm not proposing this for 2.6.19.
> 
> I just suspect it means a _buggy_ fork.
> 
> It so happens (I think), that fork is big enough that it probably flushes 
> the L1 cache _anyway_. 

My understanding is that this works because in Ralf's original patch
(which is the context in which he is removing the flush_cache_mm()
call), he uses kmap()/kunmap() to map the page(s) being accessed at a
kernel virtual address which will fall into the same cache color as
the user virtual address --> no alias problems.

Since he does this for every page touched on the kernel side during
dup_mmap(), the existing flush_cache_mm() call in dup_mmap() does in
fact become redundant.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-20 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-19 16:35 Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] Pass vma argument to copy_user_highpage() Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: Fix COW D-cache aliasing on fork Ralf Baechle
2006-10-22  2:32   ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 17:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Nick Piggin
2006-10-19 18:13   ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-19 18:48     ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-19 22:59     ` David Miller
2006-10-20 14:39       ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 15:49         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 15:57           ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 16:36             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 16:47               ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 17:16                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 17:37                   ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-21  0:46                 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-20 19:36           ` David Miller
2006-10-20 19:54             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 19:58               ` David Miller
2006-10-20 20:10                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 20:59                   ` Russell King
2006-10-20 21:06                     ` David Miller
2006-10-20 21:17                       ` Russell King
2006-10-20 21:30                         ` David Miller
2006-10-20 21:12                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 21:28                       ` Russell King
2006-10-20 21:41                       ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-21 16:28                         ` Atsushi Nemoto
2006-10-20 21:49                   ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-20 22:02                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 22:22                       ` David Miller [this message]
2006-10-20 22:51                         ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-20 23:28                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21  0:06                             ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-21  0:38                               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21  1:29                                 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-10-21  2:11                                 ` David Miller
2006-10-21  2:37                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21  2:46                                     ` David Miller
2006-10-21 18:27                                     ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-22  1:34                                     ` Ralf Baechle
2006-12-02  9:49                                 ` Russell King
2006-10-23  8:50                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-10-20 16:05         ` Ralf Baechle
2006-10-20 16:30           ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 19:23         ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061020.152247.111203913.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®