From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] Move idle status calculation into rebalance_tick()
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:33:22 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061114203322.12761.81739.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061114203256.12761.33911.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Perform the idle state determination in rebalance_tick.
If we separate balancing from sched_tick then we also need
to determine the idle state in rebalance_tick.
V2->V3
Remove useless idlle != 0 check. Checking nr_running seems
to be sufficient. Thanks Suresh.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-11-10 22:48:56.838771375 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/kernel/sched.c 2006-11-10 22:49:12.178951052 -0600
@@ -2870,10 +2870,16 @@ static void update_load(struct rq *this_
*/
static void
-rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, enum idle_type idle)
+rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
{
unsigned long interval;
struct sched_domain *sd;
+ /*
+ * We are idle if there are no processes running. This
+ * is valid even if we are the idle process (SMT).
+ */
+ enum idle_type idle = !this_rq->nr_running ?
+ SCHED_IDLE : NOT_IDLE;
for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
@@ -2905,37 +2911,26 @@ rebalance_tick(int this_cpu, struct rq *
/*
* on UP we do not need to balance between CPUs:
*/
-static inline void rebalance_tick(int cpu, struct rq *rq)
-{
-}
static inline void idle_balance(int cpu, struct rq *rq)
{
}
-static inline void update_load(struct rq *this_rq)
-{
-}
#endif
-static inline int wake_priority_sleeper(struct rq *rq)
+static inline void wake_priority_sleeper(struct rq *rq)
{
- int ret = 0;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
if (!rq->nr_running)
- return 0;
+ return;
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
/*
* If an SMT sibling task has been put to sleep for priority
* reasons reschedule the idle task to see if it can now run.
*/
- if (rq->nr_running) {
+ if (rq->nr_running)
resched_task(rq->idle);
- ret = 1;
- }
spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
#endif
- return ret;
}
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kernel_stat, kstat);
@@ -3151,20 +3146,20 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
struct task_struct *p = current;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- enum idle_type idle = NOT_IDLE;
update_cpu_clock(p, rq, now);
rq->timestamp_last_tick = now;
- if (p == rq->idle) {
+ if (p == rq->idle)
/* Task on the idle queue */
- if (!wake_priority_sleeper(rq))
- idle = SCHED_IDLE;
- } else
+ wake_priority_sleeper(rq);
+ else
task_running_tick(rq, p);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
update_load(rq);
- rebalance_tick(cpu, rq, idle);
+ rebalance_tick(cpu, rq);
+#endif
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-14 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-14 20:32 [PATCH 0/8] sched_domain balancing via softirq V4 Christoph Lameter
2006-11-14 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/8] Avoid taking rq lock in wake_priority_sleeper Christoph Lameter
2006-11-14 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/8] Remove staggering of load balancing Christoph Lameter
2006-11-14 20:33 ` [PATCH 3/8] Disable interrupts for locking in load_balance() Christoph Lameter
2006-11-14 20:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] Extract load calculation from rebalance_tick Christoph Lameter
2006-11-14 20:33 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2006-11-14 20:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] Use softirq for load balancing Christoph Lameter
2006-11-14 20:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] Call tasklet less frequently Christoph Lameter
2006-11-14 20:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] Add option to serialize load balancing Christoph Lameter
2006-11-14 20:33 ` [DEBUG] Add a few scheduler event counters Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061114203322.12761.81739.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome