mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>,
	Ben Collins <ben.collins@ubuntu.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:49:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061206234942.79d6db01.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061206224207.8a8335ee.akpm@osdl.org>

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 22:42:07 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> But I wouldn't want to think about an implementation as long as we have
> that WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL horror in there.  Can we just nuke that?  Only
> three drivers need it and I bet they can be modified to use the usual
> mechanisms.

I guess I don't understand exactly what problem the noautorel stuff is
trying to solve.  It _seems_ to me that in all cases we can simply stuff
the old `data' field in alongside the controlling work_struct or
delayed_work which wants to operate on it.

Bridge is the simple case..

diff -puN net/bridge/br_private.h~bridge-avoid-using-noautorel-workqueues net/bridge/br_private.h
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h~bridge-avoid-using-noautorel-workqueues
+++ a/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct net_bridge_port
 	struct timer_list		message_age_timer;
 	struct kobject			kobj;
 	struct delayed_work		carrier_check;
+	struct net_device		*carrier_check_dev;
 	struct rcu_head			rcu;
 };
 
diff -puN net/bridge/br_if.c~bridge-avoid-using-noautorel-workqueues net/bridge/br_if.c
--- a/net/bridge/br_if.c~bridge-avoid-using-noautorel-workqueues
+++ a/net/bridge/br_if.c
@@ -83,14 +83,11 @@ static void port_carrier_check(struct wo
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct net_bridge *br;
 
-	dev = container_of(work, struct net_bridge_port,
-			   carrier_check.work)->dev;
-	work_release(work);
-
+	p = container_of(work, struct net_bridge_port, carrier_check.work);
+	dev = p->carrier_check_dev;
 	rtnl_lock();
-	p = dev->br_port;
-	if (!p)
-		goto done;
+	if (!dev->br_port)
+		goto done;	/* Can this happen? */
 	br = p->br;
 
 	if (netif_carrier_ok(dev))
@@ -280,7 +277,8 @@ static struct net_bridge_port *new_nbp(s
 	p->port_no = index;
 	br_init_port(p);
 	p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
-	INIT_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(&p->carrier_check, port_carrier_check);
+	p->carrier_check_dev = dev;
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&p->carrier_check, port_carrier_check);
 	br_stp_port_timer_init(p);
 
 	kobject_init(&p->kobj);
_


What am I missing?

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-07  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-03  5:50 Ben Collins
2006-12-03  9:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-04 19:17   ` Steve Fox
2006-12-05 18:05     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-12-05 17:48   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-12-05 18:07     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-05 19:31       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-05 18:57     ` Andy Fleming
2006-12-06 12:31       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-12-05 20:39     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-05 20:59       ` Andy Fleming
2006-12-05 21:26         ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-05 21:37           ` Roland Dreier
2006-12-05 21:57             ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-05 23:49               ` Roland Dreier
2006-12-05 23:52               ` Roland Dreier
2006-12-06 15:25               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-12-06 15:57                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-06 17:17                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-07  1:21                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-07  6:42                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-07  7:49                         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-12-07 10:29                         ` David Howells
2006-12-07 10:42                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-07 17:05                             ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-07 17:57                               ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-07 18:17                                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-08 16:52                                 ` [PATCH] group xtime, xtime_lock, wall_to_monotonic, avenrun, calc_load_count fields together in ktimed Eric Dumazet
2006-12-09  5:46                                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-09  6:07                                     ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-11 20:44                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2006-12-11 22:00                                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-13 21:26                                   ` [PATCH] Introduce time_data, a new structure to hold jiffies, xtime, xtime_lock, wall_to_monotonic, calc_load_count and avenrun Eric Dumazet
2006-12-15  5:24                                     ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-15 11:21                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2006-12-15 16:21                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2006-12-07 18:08                               ` [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-12-07 18:59                               ` Andy Fleming
2006-12-07 16:49                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-07 17:52                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-07 18:01                             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-07 18:16                               ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-07 18:27                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-07 15:28                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-12-06 17:43                   ` David Howells
2006-12-06 17:50                     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-06 18:07                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-06 17:53                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-06 17:58                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-06 18:33                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-06 18:37                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-06 18:43                         ` David Howells
2006-12-06 19:02                           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-06 18:02                     ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061206234942.79d6db01.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=afleming@freescale.com \
    --cc=ben.collins@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®