* The drivers Kconfig structure: oddities and exceptions
@ 2006-12-07 9:36 Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-07 16:28 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2006-12-07 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux kernel mailing list
as a followup to my previous patch (and before i build on top of
that), perhaps someone can clarify some of these bits of curiosity:
1) although "Sound" is listed in the Device Drivers menu, its actual
source directory is at the top level of the kernel source tree, and
it's the *only* entry in Device Drivers that requires sourcing from
the top-level directory. any reason for this? it just kind of stands
out as a weird exception to the rule.
2) in any of these driver submenu Kconfig files, you normally see that
*all* of the Kconfig entries depend on that "parent" menu selection.
but in drivers/scsi/Kconfig, you read:
=========================================================
menu "SCSI device support"
config RAID_ATTRS ???
tristate "RAID Transport Class"
default n
depends on BLOCK
---help---
Provides RAID
config SCSI
tristate "SCSI device support"
depends on BLOCK
---help---
... snip ...
config SCSI_TGT
tristate "SCSI target support"
depends on SCSI && EXPERIMENTAL
---help---
... snip ...
config SCSI_NETLINK ???
bool
default n
select NET
...
==========================================================
one would think that, if RAID_ATTRS depends only on BLOCK, it
properly belongs under the "Block devices" menu, just as SCSI_NETLINK
might belong under NET, or perhaps it should have a SCSI dependency as
well to make it consistent. thoughts?
rday
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: The drivers Kconfig structure: oddities and exceptions
2006-12-07 9:36 The drivers Kconfig structure: oddities and exceptions Robert P. J. Day
@ 2006-12-07 16:28 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2006-12-07 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Linux kernel mailing list
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 04:36:25 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> as a followup to my previous patch (and before i build on top of
> that), perhaps someone can clarify some of these bits of curiosity:
>
> 1) although "Sound" is listed in the Device Drivers menu, its actual
> source directory is at the top level of the kernel source tree, and
> it's the *only* entry in Device Drivers that requires sourcing from
> the top-level directory. any reason for this? it just kind of stands
> out as a weird exception to the rule.
sound/ (ALSA) was a replacement for the OSS sound drivers and
needed a different directory to live/work in, that's all.
They are still Device Drivers. Don't get hung up on where
the directory is.
(part 2 omitted)
---
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-12-07 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-07 9:36 The drivers Kconfig structure: oddities and exceptions Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-07 16:28 ` Randy Dunlap
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®