mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@hp.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: workqueue deadlock
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:37:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061207113700.dc925068.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061207105148.20410b83.akpm@osdl.org>

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:51:48 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> +		if (!cpu_online(cpu))	/* oops, CPU got unplugged */
> +			goto bail;

hm, actually we can pull the same trick with flush_scheduled_work(). 
Should fix quite a few things...



From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>

We have a class of deadlocks where the flush_scheduled_work() caller can get
stuck waiting for a work to complete, where that work wants to take
workqueue_mutex for some reason.

Fix this by not holding workqueue_mutex when waiting for a workqueue to flush.

The patch assumes that the per-cpu workqueue won't get freed up while there's
a task waiting on cpu_workqueue_struct.work_done.  If that can happen,
run_workqueue() would crash anyway.

Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Gautham shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
---

 kernel/workqueue.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/workqueue.c~workqueue-dont-hold-workqueue_mutex-in-flush_scheduled_work kernel/workqueue.c
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c~workqueue-dont-hold-workqueue_mutex-in-flush_scheduled_work
+++ a/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -325,14 +325,22 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
+/*
+ * If cpu == -1 it's a single-threaded workqueue and the caller does not hold
+ * workqueue_mutex
+ */
+static void flush_cpu_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq, int cpu)
 {
 	if (cwq->thread == current) {
 		/*
 		 * Probably keventd trying to flush its own queue. So simply run
 		 * it by hand rather than deadlocking.
 		 */
+		if (cpu != -1)
+			mutex_unlock(&workqueue_mutex);
 		run_workqueue(cwq);
+		if (cpu != -1)
+			mutex_lock(&workqueue_mutex);
 	} else {
 		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 		long sequence_needed;
@@ -344,7 +352,14 @@ static void flush_cpu_workqueue(struct c
 			prepare_to_wait(&cwq->work_done, &wait,
 					TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 			spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock);
+			if (cpu != -1)
+				mutex_unlock(&workqueue_mutex);
 			schedule();
+			if (cpu != -1) {
+				mutex_lock(&workqueue_mutex);
+				if (!cpu_online(cpu))
+					return; /* oops, CPU unplugged */
+			}
 			spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
 		}
 		finish_wait(&cwq->work_done, &wait);
@@ -373,13 +388,14 @@ void fastcall flush_workqueue(struct wor
 
 	if (is_single_threaded(wq)) {
 		/* Always use first cpu's area. */
-		flush_cpu_workqueue(per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, singlethread_cpu));
+		flush_cpu_workqueue(per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, singlethread_cpu),
+					-1);
 	} else {
 		int cpu;
 
 		mutex_lock(&workqueue_mutex);
 		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
-			flush_cpu_workqueue(per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu));
+			flush_cpu_workqueue(per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu), cpu);
 		mutex_unlock(&workqueue_mutex);
 	}
 }
_


  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-07 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-07  0:26 Bjorn Helgaas
2006-12-07  6:17 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-12-07  6:45   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-12-07 18:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-07 19:37   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-12-08  2:53     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-12-08  4:54       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-08  7:58         ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-12-09 10:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-09 19:47           ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-10  8:26             ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-10  8:43               ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-10 11:49                 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-10 12:16                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-10 12:19                     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-10 12:34                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-11  6:09                         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-10 14:18                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-12-11  6:52                       ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-12-11 16:34                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-12-11  5:45                     ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-12-11  6:03                       ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-11  4:58               ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061207113700.dc925068.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=myron.stowe@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®