mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Malte Schröder" <MalteSch@gmx.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	reiserfs-dev@namesys.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:08:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701091908.44576.MalteSch@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701090944070.3594@woody.osdl.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1984 bytes --]

On Tuesday 09 January 2007 18:58, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Subject : BUG: at mm/truncate.c:60 cancel_dirty_page()  (reiserfs)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/7/117
> > Submitter : Malte Schröder <MalteSch@gmx.de>
> > Status : unknown
>
> Adrian, this is also available as
>
> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/5/308
>
> But, at worst, I don't think this is a show-stopper (oh, well: I actually
> liked it better when "WARN_ON()" said _warning_, not BUG, since it
> separates out the two cases visually much better, but others disagreed.
> Crud).

--8<--

> So something interesting is definitely going on, but I don't know exactly
> what it is. Why does reiserfs do the truncate as part of a close, if the
> same inode is actually mapped somewhere else? And if it's a race with two
> different CPU's (one doing a "munmap()" and the other doing a "close()",
> then the unmap should _still_ have actually unmapped the pages before it
> actually did _its_ "release()" call.

This was on a single core. But with CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y.
It didn't happen again since then. 

>
> In general, a filesystem should never do a truncate at "release()" time
> _anyway_. It should do it at "drop_inode" time.
>
> So I think this does show some confusion in reiserfs, but it's not
> anything new. The only new thing is that the _message_ happens.
>
> So I don't personally consider this a regression. Just a sign of old and
> preexisting confusion that is now uncovered by new code (and it will print
> out the scary message at most four times, and then stop complaining about
> it. So apart from the scary message, nothing new and bad has really
> happened).

I also didn't reboot the machine afterwards and did not notice any problems 
beside that one message.

-- 
---------------------------------------
Malte Schröder
MalteSch@gmx.de
ICQ# 68121508
---------------------------------------


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-09 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-07  6:19 Linux 2.6.20-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 10:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-07 11:44   ` Russell King
2007-01-07 13:06     ` OT: character encodings (was: Linux 2.6.20-rc4) Tilman Schmidt
2007-01-07 15:13       ` David Woodhouse
2007-01-07 15:38         ` Russell King
2007-01-07 16:29           ` David Woodhouse
2007-01-07 17:06             ` Russell King
2007-01-07 19:11               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-07 19:20                 ` Russell King
2007-01-07 20:48                 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-07 23:37                   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-08  0:38                     ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-08  1:03                       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-08  1:14                         ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-08  1:45                           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-08  6:52                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-08  8:02                           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-08  1:32                       ` OT: character encodings Tilman Schmidt
2007-01-08  1:59                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-08 19:53                       ` OT: character encodings (was: Linux 2.6.20-rc4) Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-01-07 19:29               ` OT: character encodings Tilman Schmidt
2007-01-07 18:21           ` OT: character encodings (was: Linux 2.6.20-rc4) Alan
2007-01-07 19:12             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-07 22:30               ` Alan
2007-01-08  1:22                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-08 20:17                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-08 22:00                     ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-08 23:21                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-08 23:34                         ` Eberhard Moenkeberg
2007-01-08 16:14                 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-08 22:17                   ` Tim Pepper
2007-01-08 23:30                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-07 19:17             ` Russell King
2007-01-07 19:58               ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-01-07 20:05               ` Dave Jones
2007-01-07 20:15                 ` Sean
2007-01-07 20:40                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-07 21:07                     ` Xavier Bestel
2007-01-08  4:42                 ` David Woodhouse
2007-01-08  1:40               ` Horst H. von Brand
2007-01-07 13:23   ` Linux 2.6.20-rc4 Alan
2007-01-07 12:15 ` Akula2
2007-01-07 12:55   ` Russell King
2007-01-07 13:38     ` Akula2
2007-01-07 13:53       ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-07 14:23         ` Akula2
2007-01-07 20:57 ` Peter Osterlund
2007-01-07 21:04   ` Peter Osterlund
2007-01-08 15:50     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-01-07 22:50   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-08  1:00     ` David Miller
2007-01-08  6:38       ` Peter Osterlund
2007-01-08 20:49       ` Peter Osterlund
2007-01-08 21:52         ` David Miller
2007-01-08 22:33     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-01-08 23:02       ` Peter Osterlund
2007-01-08 23:12         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-09  3:42           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-09  7:39           ` David Miller
2007-01-07 21:22 ` Gene Heskett
2007-01-08  0:22 ` 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-01-08  1:20   ` Bernhard Schmidt
2007-01-08  0:25 ` 2.6.20-rc4: known regressions with patches available Adrian Bunk
2007-01-08  0:33   ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-01-08 14:50 ` Linux 2.6.20-rc4 Mariusz Kozlowski
2007-01-08 14:58   ` Sylvain Munaut
2007-01-08 15:03     ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2007-01-08 19:11     ` Jean Delvare
2007-01-09  0:38     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09  0:56       ` Greg KH
2007-01-09  2:05         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09  7:04           ` David Woodhouse
2007-01-09  7:04             ` Sylvain Munaut
2007-01-09  9:04             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09  7:14           ` Sylvain Munaut
2007-01-09  7:28             ` David Woodhouse
2007-01-09  9:08               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09  9:07             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-01-09  7:18           ` Greg KH
2007-01-09  5:25 ` 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-09 17:58   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-09 18:08     ` Malte Schröder [this message]
2007-01-09 18:30       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-11  0:24         ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2007-01-11  1:00           ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-11 13:12             ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2007-01-11 23:53               ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-09 20:28     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-09  5:51 ` 2.6.20-rc4: known regressions with patches (v2) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-11  5:10 ` 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-11  6:43   ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-11  8:45     ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-11 10:21       ` Jiri Kosina
2007-01-11 10:54         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-11 11:08           ` CIJOML
2007-01-11  5:13 ` 2.6.20-rc4: known regressions with patches (v3) Adrian Bunk
2007-01-11 21:39   ` David Chinner
2007-01-11 22:02     ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-11 23:05       ` David Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200701091908.44576.MalteSch@gmx.de \
    --to=maltesch@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome