From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen.Clark@seclark.us
Cc: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>,
"Sunil Naidu" <akula2.shark@gmail.com>,
"Ismail Dönmez" <ismail@pardus.org.tr>
Subject: Re: Abysmal disk performance, how to debug?
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:06:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701202306.09087.gene.heskett@verizon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45B2E0DD.9020807@seclark.us>
On Saturday 20 January 2007 22:41, Stephen Clark wrote:
>Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:56:20PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
>>>Sunil Naidu wrote:
>>>>On 1/20/07, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
>>>>>It is not expected to increase write performance, but it should help
>>>>>you do something else during that time, or also give more
>>>>> responsiveness to Ctrl-C. It is possible that you have fast and
>>>>> slow RAM, or that your video card uses shared memory which slows
>>>>> down some parts of memory which are not used anymore with those
>>>>> parameters.
>>>>
>>>>I did test some SATA drives, am getting these value for 2.6.20-rc5:-
>>>>
>>>>[sukhoi@Typhoon ~]$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024
>>>>1024+0 records in
>>>>1024+0 records out
>>>>1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 21.0962 seconds, 50.9 MB/s
>>>>
>>>>What can you suggest here w.r.t my RAM & disk?
>>>>
>>>>>Willy
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>~Akula2
>>>>-
>>>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>>>> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>whitebook vbi s96f core 2 duo t5600 2gb hitachi ATA
>>> HTS721060G9AT00 using libata
>>>time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024
>>>1024+0 records in
>>>1024+0 records out
>>>1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 10.0092 seconds, 107 MB/s
>>>
>>>real 0m10.196s
>>>user 0m0.004s
>>>sys 0m3.440s
>>
>>You have too much RAM, it's possible that writes did not complete
>> before the end of your measurement. Try this instead :
>>
>>$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024 | sync
>>
>>Willy
>
>Yeah that make a difference:
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024 | sync
>1024+0 records in
>1024+0 records out
>1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.86719 seconds, 121 MB/s
>
>real 0m43.601s
>user 0m0.004s
>sys 0m3.912s
I'd reconsider my new years resolutions for figures like that:
#> time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024 | sync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 24.1455 seconds, 44.5 MB/s
real 0m25.218s
user 0m0.009s
sys 0m5.763s
but then I also have only a gig of ram. So does this look normal?
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2007 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-21 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-20 17:20 Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 17:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 17:52 ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 18:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 18:06 ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 19:44 ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-20 19:56 ` Stephen Clark
2007-01-20 20:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-21 3:41 ` Stephen Clark
2007-01-21 4:06 ` Gene Heskett [this message]
2007-01-27 19:43 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-03 17:22 ` Elladan
2007-01-20 20:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 20:11 ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 20:10 ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 20:16 ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 20:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 20:28 ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 20:31 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 20:21 ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 20:28 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 20:39 ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 21:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 21:41 ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 21:12 ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-20 22:00 ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 23:47 ` Sunil Naidu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200701202306.09087.gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--to=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=Stephen.Clark@seclark.us \
--cc=akula2.shark@gmail.com \
--cc=ismail@pardus.org.tr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®