mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sunil Naidu" <akula2.shark@gmail.com>
To: "Tim Schmielau" <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Cc: "Ismail Dönm" <ismail@pardus.org.tr>, "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Abysmal disk performance, how to debug?
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:17:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8355959a0701201547x137d7897t528bcee2538f1369@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701202252550.24255@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de>

On 1/21/07, Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de> wrote:
> Yes. You have a faster Disk that writes about 45 MB/s. But I am not sure I
> understand what you want to know?

I got these results with a customized 2.6.20-rc5.

[sukhoi@Typhoon kernel]$ uname -a
Linux Typhoon 2.6.20-rc5-Topol-M #1 SMP Sun Jan 21 04:35:28 IST 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux


> > [sukhoi@Typhoon ~]$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024; time
> > sync
> > 1024+0 records in
> > 1024+0 records out
> > 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.5007 seconds, 55.1 MB/s
> >
> > real    0m20.439s
> > user    0m0.004s
> > sys     0m4.535s
> >
> > real    0m4.625s
> > user    0m0.000s
> > sys     0m0.125s

[sukhoi@Typhoon kernel]$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024; time
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 22.7749 seconds, 47.1 MB/s

real    0m24.541s
user    0m0.005s
sys     0m3.899s

real    0m0.000s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.000s

> >
> > [sukhoi@Typhoon ~]$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M count=1024 | sync
> > 1024+0 records in
> > 1024+0 records out
> > 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 20.8707 seconds, 51.4 MB/s
> >
> > real    0m22.449s
> > user    0m0.002s
> > sys     0m4.922s

[sukhoi@Typhoon kernel]$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/1GB bs=1M
count=1024 | sync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 19.8685 seconds, 54.0 MB/s

real    0m21.373s
user    0m0.003s
sys     0m3.859s

> > Linux used here is not 2.6.20-rc5, but it's a FC6 2.6.19 binary. Shall
> > post the results with 2.6.20-rc5.
> >
> > BTW, does the results vary with a customized kernel (configured w.r.t
> > Processor & Hardware) than a generic kernel like FC6?
>
> I'd guess the kernel won't make much of a difference as the time is
> mostly determined by RAM and disk speeds.

There is some deviation in the results between these 2 kernels. Is
this acceptable?

> > Are there any other such test cases?
>
> Well, what do you want to find out? Anyways, I am in no way expert in the
> field of benchmarking.

I would be trying to benchmark the results on my machines in this
fashion (overclocking experiment):-

Disk Types                                       Machine
                            RAM

SATA 1.5 GBPS  - 160 GB           P4-HT-3.0 GHz
   2x1GB Corsair
SATA 3.0 GBPS  -  320 GB          P4-HT-3.0 GHz
   2x1GB Corsair

SATA 1.5 GBPS  -  160 GB           P4-HT-3.0 GHz
   2x1GB OCZ
SATA 3.0 GBPS  -   320 GB           P4-HT-3.0 GHz
    2x1GB OCZ

SATA 1.5 GBPS  -  160 GB              P4-HT-3.0 GHz
    2x1GB Supertalent
SATA 3.0 GBPS  -   320 GB             P4-HT-3.0 GHz
    2x1GB Supertalent

SATA 1.5 GBPS  -  160 GB             P4-HT-3.0 GHz
    2x1GB Hynix
SATA 3.0 GBPS  -   320 GB            P4-HT-3.0 GHz
     2x1GB Hynix

Boards here would be used are Intel based 915, 965, and 975.

Would be happy to know more test cases - for RAM/Disk/Processor Frequency

And, I don't work for any magazine, writing a review ;-)

>
> Tim

Thanks,

~Akula2

      reply	other threads:[~2007-01-20 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-20 17:20 Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 17:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 17:52   ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 18:03     ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 18:06       ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 19:44       ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-20 19:56         ` Stephen Clark
2007-01-20 20:09           ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-21  3:41             ` Stephen Clark
2007-01-21  4:06               ` Gene Heskett
2007-01-27 19:43             ` Bill Davidsen
2007-02-03 17:22               ` Elladan
2007-01-20 20:05         ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 20:11           ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 20:10     ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 20:16       ` Ismail Dönmez
2007-01-20 20:19         ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 20:28           ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 20:31             ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 20:21         ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 20:28       ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 20:39         ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 21:24           ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-20 21:41             ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 21:12       ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-20 22:00         ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-20 23:47           ` Sunil Naidu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8355959a0701201547x137d7897t528bcee2538f1369@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=akula2.shark@gmail.com \
    --cc=ismail@pardus.org.tr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®