mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
To: "Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, judith@linux-foundation.org,
	fastboot@lists.osdl.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH RFC 0/5] hard_smp_processor_id overhaul
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:23:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070302072348.GC21694@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172733373.1498.264.camel@sebastian.intellilink.co.jp>

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:16:13PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> With the advent of kdump, the assumption that the boot CPU when running
> an UP kernel is always the CPU with a hardware ID of 0 (usually referred
> to as BSP on some architectures) does not hold true anymore. The reason
> being that the dump capture kernel boots on the crashed CPU (the CPU
> that invoked crash_kexec).
> 
> As a consequence, the hardcoding of hard_smp_processor_id() to 0 on UP
> systems (see "linux/smp.h") is not correct.
> 
> This patch-set does the following:
> 
> 1- Remove hardcoding of hard_smp_processor_id on UP systems.
> 
> 2- Ask the hardware when possible to obtain the hardware processor id on
> i386, x86_64, and ia64, independently of whether CONFIG_SMP is set or
> not.
> 
> 3- Move definition of hard_smp_processor_id for the UP case to asm/smp.h
> on alpha, m32r, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, and um architectures. I
> guess that hardware features could be used to implement
> hard_smp_processor_id even in the UP case, but since I am not an expert
> in this architectures I just move the definition.
> 
> The patches have been tested on i386, x86_64, and ia64.

Hi Fernando,

These patches seem find to me. Tested on ia64 (Tiger2)

Acked: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-02  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-01  7:16 Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2007-03-01 14:06 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-03-02  3:10   ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2007-03-02  4:14   ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2007-03-02  8:06     ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2007-03-02  8:16       ` [PATCH] hard_smp_processor_id definition for UP systems without APIC (i386) Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2007-03-02  7:23 ` Horms [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070302072348.GC21694@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=judith@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome