From: Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:57:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703052357.20035.shawn.starr@rogers.com> (raw)
On Monday 05 March 2007 10:13, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Con,
>
> I've now given it a try with HZ=250 on my dual-athlon. It works
> beautifully. I also quickly checked that playing mp3 doesn't skip during
> make -j4, and that gears runs fairly smoothly, since those are the
> references people often use.
>
> But with real work, it's excellent too. When I saturate my CPUs by
> injecting HTTP traffic on haproxy, the load is stable and the command line
> perfectly responsive, while in the past the load would oscillate and the
> command line sometimes stopped to respond for a few seconds.
>
> I've also launched my scheddos program (you may remember, the one we did a
> few experiments with). I could not cause any freeze at all. Plain 2.6.20
> had already improved a lot in this area, but above 4 processes/CPU,
> occasional short freezes did still occur. This time, even at 100 processes,
> the system was rather slow (of course!) but just as expected, and nothing
> more.
>
> I also tried the good old "dd if=/dev/zero bs=1|...|dd bs=1 of=/dev/null"
> and it did not cause any trouble.
>
> I will boot 2.6 slightly more often to test the code under various
> conditions, and I will recommend it to a few people I know who tend to
> switch back to 2.4 after one day full of 2.6 jerkiness.
>
> Overall, you have done a great job !
>
> I hope that more people will give it a try, first to help find possible
> remaining bugs, and to pronounce in favour of its inclusion in mainline.
Hi Con/Willy,
Just to chime on this thread, I've been testing Con's scheduler patches since
he mentioned them to me. I have to say for desktop performance all processes
running remain responsive (although with more resource hungry processes
things get slower but remain responsive, but expected). I have also been
testing his scheduler on my work power workstation running 4 VMs with 4GB of
ram on a dual-core EM64T box, again RSDL performs rather well balancing VM
resources even while I have xmms running, xchat, beryl and a bunch of other
stuff. There is total response to each process.
Thanks,
Shawn.
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-06 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-06 4:57 Shawn Starr [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-11 22:29 bert hubert
2007-03-11 22:57 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-08 14:27 Tim Tassonis
2007-03-05 9:45 Nicolas Mailhot
2007-03-05 9:53 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-05 10:00 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2007-03-05 15:22 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2007-03-05 18:37 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-05 18:20 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-05 19:19 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-05 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-05 23:19 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-06 2:23 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-03-06 2:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-06 3:36 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-09 4:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-09 6:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-09 7:04 ` Bill Huey
2007-03-09 10:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-09 14:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-09 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-06 17:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-06 20:06 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 4:21 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-04 20:35 Al Boldi
2007-03-04 21:49 ` Con Kolivas
[not found] ` <45EB45F7.3050208@simon.arlott.org.uk>
2007-03-04 22:27 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-05 18:29 ` Simon Arlott
2007-03-05 21:36 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-04 23:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-04 23:58 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-05 1:09 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-06 8:42 ` [ck] " Xavier Bestel
2007-03-06 15:15 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-11 18:11 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-11 21:52 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 22:12 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 4:42 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-12 4:53 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 11:26 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-12 12:52 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 14:14 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-12 14:58 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-12 17:41 ` Al Boldi
2007-03-12 18:05 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-18 1:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-04 7:00 Con Kolivas
2007-03-04 7:45 ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2007-03-04 14:04 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-04 11:08 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-04 11:47 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-04 12:24 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-04 12:46 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-04 13:25 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-04 13:49 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-04 14:11 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-05 2:31 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2007-03-05 3:16 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-04 14:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-04 16:08 ` [ck] " jos poortvliet
2007-03-05 23:05 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-06 0:18 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-06 4:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-06 5:39 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-03-06 19:04 ` jos poortvliet
2007-03-06 21:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-06 21:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-05 21:52 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-08 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-08 10:07 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-08 20:25 ` Fabio Comolli
2007-03-08 20:57 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-08 21:31 ` Fabio Comolli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703052357.20035.shawn.starr@rogers.com \
--to=shawn.starr@rogers.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome