From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [-mm3 PATCH] (Retry) Check the return value of kobject_add and etc.
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:24:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070411112453.53167655@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070410151815.906ef9b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:18:15 -0700,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Note that I changed it to not send the KOBJ_REMOVE if we didn't send a
> KOBJ_ADD.
The whole part_uevent_suppress stuff is not really nice, causing the
code to use a lot of kobject_{init,add} and kobject_{del,put} instead
of kobject_register and kobject_unregister. Looking at
driver-class/block-device.patch in Greg's tree, it should be possible
to use something like the uevent_filter stuff after block has been
converted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-11 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-01 7:32 Cong WANG
2007-04-02 11:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-05 4:54 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-05 9:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-05 14:44 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-05 15:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-05 15:27 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-05 16:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-06 2:53 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-10 12:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-10 12:35 ` [Patch -mm] kobject: kobject_add() reference leak Cornelia Huck
2007-04-10 14:08 ` [-mm3 PATCH] (Retry) Check the return value of kobject_add and etc WANG Cong
2007-04-10 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 6:45 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-11 7:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 9:24 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2007-04-01 8:22 Parag Warudkar
2007-04-01 13:46 ` Parag Warudkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070411112453.53167655@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®