From: mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman)
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] Enhance ramfs to support higher order pages
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:42:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070420134226.GA16878@skynet.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070419163540.11948.51549.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On (19/04/07 09:35), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> Variable Order Page Cache: Add support to ramfs
>
> The simplest file system to use is ramfs. Add a mount parameter that
> specifies the page order of the pages that ramfs should use. If the
> order is greater than zero then disable mmap functionality.
>
> This could be removed if the VM would be changes to support faulting
> higher order pages but for now we are content with buffered I/O on higher
> order pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
>
> ---
> fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c | 11 +++++++++++
> fs/ramfs/inode.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> include/linux/ramfs.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc7.orig/fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c 2007-04-18 21:46:38.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c 2007-04-18 22:02:03.000000000 -0700
> @@ -45,6 +45,17 @@ const struct file_operations ramfs_file_
> .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> };
>
> +/* Higher order mappings do not support mmmap */
> +const struct file_operations ramfs_file_higher_order_operations = {
> + .read = do_sync_read,
> + .aio_read = generic_file_aio_read,
> + .write = do_sync_write,
> + .aio_write = generic_file_aio_write,
> + .fsync = simple_sync_file,
> + .sendfile = generic_file_sendfile,
> + .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> +};
> +
> const struct inode_operations ramfs_file_inode_operations = {
> .getattr = simple_getattr,
> };
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/ramfs/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc7.orig/fs/ramfs/inode.c 2007-04-18 21:46:38.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/ramfs/inode.c 2007-04-18 22:02:03.000000000 -0700
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct inode *ramfs_get_inode(struct sup
> inode->i_blocks = 0;
> inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &ramfs_aops;
> inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info = &ramfs_backing_dev_info;
> + inode->i_mapping->order = sb->s_blocksize_bits - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
> switch (mode & S_IFMT) {
> default:
> @@ -68,7 +69,10 @@ struct inode *ramfs_get_inode(struct sup
> break;
> case S_IFREG:
> inode->i_op = &ramfs_file_inode_operations;
> - inode->i_fop = &ramfs_file_operations;
> + if (inode->i_mapping->order)
> + inode->i_fop = &ramfs_file_higher_order_operations;
> + else
> + inode->i_fop = &ramfs_file_operations;
So the difference here appears to be that specifying an order means you
can't mmap(). right?
That's fair enough for the moment but relaxing would make ramfs
potentially usable as a replacement for hugetlbfs so there would be just
one ram-based filesystem instead of two.
> break;
> case S_IFDIR:
> inode->i_op = &ramfs_dir_inode_operations;
> @@ -164,10 +168,15 @@ static int ramfs_fill_super(struct super
> {
> struct inode * inode;
> struct dentry * root;
> + int order = 0;
> + char *options = data;
> +
> + if (options && *options)
> + order = simple_strtoul(options, NULL, 10);
>
Not the nicest option there but no harm for the moment.
> sb->s_maxbytes = MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
> - sb->s_blocksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
> - sb->s_blocksize_bits = PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> + sb->s_blocksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE << order;
> + sb->s_blocksize_bits = order + PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> sb->s_magic = RAMFS_MAGIC;
> sb->s_op = &ramfs_ops;
> sb->s_time_gran = 1;
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc7/include/linux/ramfs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc7.orig/include/linux/ramfs.h 2007-04-18 21:46:38.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7/include/linux/ramfs.h 2007-04-18 22:02:03.000000000 -0700
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern int ramfs_nommu_mmap(struct file
> #endif
>
> extern const struct file_operations ramfs_file_operations;
> +extern const struct file_operations ramfs_file_higher_order_operations;
> extern struct vm_operations_struct generic_file_vm_ops;
> extern int __init init_rootfs(void);
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-20 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-19 16:35 [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 1/8] Add order field to address_space struct Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 2/8] Basic allocation for higher order page cache pages Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 10:55 ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 3/8] Flushing and zeroing " Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 11:02 ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-20 16:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 16:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 18:48 ` Adam Litke
2007-04-19 19:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 22:50 ` David Chinner
2007-04-20 1:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 8:21 ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-20 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 16:51 ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-20 11:05 ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-20 18:50 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-04-20 19:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 19:27 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-04-24 23:00 ` Matt Mackall
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 5/8] Enhance generic_read/write " Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 6/8] Account for pages in the page cache in terms of base pages Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 17:45 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-04-19 17:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 17:54 ` Avi Kivity
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 7/8] Enhance ramfs to support higher order pages Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 13:42 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2007-04-20 14:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 16:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 17:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 17:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 17:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 19:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 17:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 18:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 18:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 16:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 8/8] Add some debug output Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 19:09 ` [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-19 19:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 19:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-19 19:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 14:37 ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-19 22:42 ` David Chinner
2007-04-20 1:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 6:32 ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-20 7:48 ` David Chinner
2007-04-21 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-19 23:58 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-04-20 1:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 4:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 5:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 6:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 8:42 ` David Chinner
2007-04-20 14:14 ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-20 16:23 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070420134226.GA16878@skynet.ie \
--to=mel@skynet.ie \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome