mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mel@skynet.ie (Mel Gorman)
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] Enhance ramfs to support higher order pages
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:42:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070420134226.GA16878@skynet.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070419163540.11948.51549.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On (19/04/07 09:35), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> Variable Order Page Cache: Add support to ramfs
> 
> The simplest file system to use is ramfs. Add a mount parameter that
> specifies the page order of the pages that ramfs should use. If the
> order is greater than zero then disable mmap functionality.
> 
> This could be removed if the VM would be changes to support faulting
> higher order pages but for now we are content with buffered I/O on higher
> order pages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> 
> ---
>  fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c   |   11 +++++++++++
>  fs/ramfs/inode.c      |   15 ++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/ramfs.h |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc7.orig/fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c	2007-04-18 21:46:38.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/ramfs/file-mmu.c	2007-04-18 22:02:03.000000000 -0700
> @@ -45,6 +45,17 @@ const struct file_operations ramfs_file_
>  	.llseek		= generic_file_llseek,
>  };
>  
> +/* Higher order mappings do not support mmmap */
> +const struct file_operations ramfs_file_higher_order_operations = {
> +	.read		= do_sync_read,
> +	.aio_read	= generic_file_aio_read,
> +	.write		= do_sync_write,
> +	.aio_write	= generic_file_aio_write,
> +	.fsync		= simple_sync_file,
> +	.sendfile	= generic_file_sendfile,
> +	.llseek		= generic_file_llseek,
> +};
> +
>  const struct inode_operations ramfs_file_inode_operations = {
>  	.getattr	= simple_getattr,
>  };
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/ramfs/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc7.orig/fs/ramfs/inode.c	2007-04-18 21:46:38.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7/fs/ramfs/inode.c	2007-04-18 22:02:03.000000000 -0700
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct inode *ramfs_get_inode(struct sup
>  		inode->i_blocks = 0;
>  		inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &ramfs_aops;
>  		inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info = &ramfs_backing_dev_info;
> +		inode->i_mapping->order = sb->s_blocksize_bits - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>  		inode->i_atime = inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
>  		switch (mode & S_IFMT) {
>  		default:
> @@ -68,7 +69,10 @@ struct inode *ramfs_get_inode(struct sup
>  			break;
>  		case S_IFREG:
>  			inode->i_op = &ramfs_file_inode_operations;
> -			inode->i_fop = &ramfs_file_operations;
> +			if (inode->i_mapping->order)
> +				inode->i_fop = &ramfs_file_higher_order_operations;
> +			else
> +				inode->i_fop = &ramfs_file_operations;

So the difference here appears to be that specifying an order means you
can't mmap(). right?

That's fair enough for the moment but relaxing would make ramfs
potentially usable as a replacement for hugetlbfs so there would be just
one ram-based filesystem instead of two.

>  			break;
>  		case S_IFDIR:
>  			inode->i_op = &ramfs_dir_inode_operations;
> @@ -164,10 +168,15 @@ static int ramfs_fill_super(struct super
>  {
>  	struct inode * inode;
>  	struct dentry * root;
> +	int order = 0;
> +	char *options = data;
> +
> +	if (options && *options)
> +		order = simple_strtoul(options, NULL, 10);
>  

Not the nicest option there but no harm for the moment.

>  	sb->s_maxbytes = MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
> -	sb->s_blocksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
> -	sb->s_blocksize_bits = PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +	sb->s_blocksize = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE << order;
> +	sb->s_blocksize_bits = order + PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>  	sb->s_magic = RAMFS_MAGIC;
>  	sb->s_op = &ramfs_ops;
>  	sb->s_time_gran = 1;
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc7/include/linux/ramfs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc7.orig/include/linux/ramfs.h	2007-04-18 21:46:38.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7/include/linux/ramfs.h	2007-04-18 22:02:03.000000000 -0700
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern int ramfs_nommu_mmap(struct file 
>  #endif
>  
>  extern const struct file_operations ramfs_file_operations;
> +extern const struct file_operations ramfs_file_higher_order_operations;
>  extern struct vm_operations_struct generic_file_vm_ops;
>  extern int __init init_rootfs(void);
>  

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-20 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-19 16:35 [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 1/8] Add order field to address_space struct Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 2/8] Basic allocation for higher order page cache pages Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 10:55   ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 3/8] Flushing and zeroing " Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 11:02   ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-20 16:15     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 16:51       ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 4/8] Enhance fallback functions in libs to support higher order pages Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 18:48   ` Adam Litke
2007-04-19 19:10     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 22:50       ` David Chinner
2007-04-20  1:15         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20  8:21       ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-20 16:01         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 16:51           ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-20 11:05   ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-20 18:50     ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-04-20 19:10       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 19:27         ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-04-24 23:00         ` Matt Mackall
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 5/8] Enhance generic_read/write " Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 6/8] Account for pages in the page cache in terms of base pages Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 17:45   ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-04-19 17:52     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 17:54       ` Avi Kivity
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 7/8] Enhance ramfs to support higher order pages Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 13:42   ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2007-04-20 14:47     ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 16:30       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 17:11         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 17:15           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 17:19             ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 17:57               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 19:21                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20 17:59               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 18:01               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 18:02               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 16:20     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 16:35 ` [RFC 8/8] Add some debug output Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 19:09 ` [RFC 0/8] Variable Order Page Cache Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-19 19:12   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-19 19:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-19 19:15   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 14:37   ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-19 22:42 ` David Chinner
2007-04-20  1:14   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20  6:32   ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-20  7:48     ` David Chinner
2007-04-21 22:18       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-19 23:58 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-04-20  1:15   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20  4:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20  5:27   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20  6:22     ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-20  8:42   ` David Chinner
2007-04-20 14:14 ` Mel Gorman
2007-04-20 16:23   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070420134226.GA16878@skynet.ie \
    --to=mel@skynet.ie \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome