mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: vgoyal@in.ibm.com, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jurriaan <thunder7@xs4all.nl>,
	Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>,
	Horms <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header.
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:25:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070501062554.GT25929@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1zm4pyuzp.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:26:50PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> 
> >> At least without a core file it is working on with gdb 6.4.
> >>
> >
> > This seems to be a problem with gdb 6.5. I transferred the dump to a
> > different machine having GNU gdb 6.4, and it works fine there.
> 
> Ok.  The difference between those two symbols didn't seem to make
> any sense, so a gdb bug makes sense.
> 
> Cool.  Then the patch is good. :)

It would still make any gdb 6.5 users unhappy. If no workaround can be found
I guess we'll need a CONFIG of some sort?

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-01  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-30 15:12 Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-30 15:17 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-01  3:55   ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01  4:20     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  5:06       ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-01  5:26         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  6:25           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-05-01  5:54             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  6:44               ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-28 10:54         ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-28 11:09           ` Vivek Goyal
2007-05-28 14:39             ` Bernhard Walle
2007-06-01 12:26               ` Bernhard Walle
2007-05-28 14:57           ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-31  7:53 2.6.21-rc5-mm3 - no boot, "address not 2M aligned" Andrew Morton
2007-04-01  5:29 ` thunder7
2007-04-01  6:15   ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-01  6:29     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-02  7:41       ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-02  8:43         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-02  9:45           ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-02 17:26             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-03  4:01               ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-03  5:23                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-03 10:03                   ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-23  5:12                     ` [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: Reflect the relocatability of the kernel in the ELF header Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24  6:31                       ` Vivek Goyal
2007-04-24  7:21                         ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070501062554.GT25929@bingen.suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thunder7@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome