From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
To: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Hellstr?m" <thomas@tungstengraphics.com>,
"Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"Eric Anholt" <eric@anholt.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] DRM TTM Memory Manager patch
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 00:36:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705020036.38322.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970704301610u5d5132uc282ac697c9df2be@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > - what's with the /proc interface? Don't add new proc code for
> > non-process related things. This should all go into sysfs
> > somewhere. And yes, I know /proc/dri/ is there today, but don't add
> > new stuff please.
>
> Well we should move all that stuff to sysfs, but we have all the
> infrastructure for publishing this stuff under /proc/dri and adding
> new files doesn't take a major amount, as much as I appreciate sysfs,
> it isn't suitable for this sort of information dump, the whole one
> value per file is quite useless to provide this sort of information
> which is uni-directional for users to send to us for debugging without
> have to install some special tool to join all the values into one
> place.. and I don't think drmfs is the answer either... or maybe it
> is....
Ok, what about debugfs then? If it is just for debugging blobs -> debugfs,
if it is crucial for operation -> sysfs and representation of one value
per file.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-26 6:55 Dave Airlie
2007-04-27 16:39 ` Greg KH
2007-04-30 23:10 ` Dave Airlie
2007-04-30 23:50 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-01 0:10 ` Thomas Hellström
2007-05-01 22:36 ` Ingo Oeser [this message]
2007-05-02 3:59 ` Greg KH
2007-05-02 20:21 ` Eric Anholt
2007-05-02 23:01 ` Thomas Hellström
2007-05-04 4:07 ` Keith Packard
2007-05-04 8:07 ` Thomas Hellström
2007-05-04 8:49 ` Jerome Glisse
2007-05-04 9:40 ` Jerome Glisse
2007-05-04 15:28 ` Keith Packard
2007-05-04 11:03 ` Thomas Hellström
2007-05-04 11:57 ` Jerome Glisse
2007-05-04 12:32 ` Thomas Hellström
2007-05-04 12:52 ` Jerome Glisse
2007-05-04 15:32 ` Keith Packard
2007-05-04 15:15 ` Keith Packard
2007-05-04 15:57 ` Keith Whitwell
2007-05-04 16:26 ` Keith Packard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705020036.38322.ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
--to=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas@tungstengraphics.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®