From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC: Flush mmc workqueue late in the boot sequence
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070510143737.54969394@dhcp-252-105.norway.atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46430A49.9090803@drzeus.cx>
On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:04:25 +0200
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx> wrote:
> Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> > At some point before 2.6.20, the mmc subsystem moved the card
> > detection code to its own workqueue. One consequence of this change
> > is that when using an mmc card as a root device, the card may get
> > detected after the init task attempts to mount the root filesystem,
> > causing a kernel panic because the root device could not be opened.
> >
> > This patch adds a call to mmc_flush_scheduled_work() late in the boot
> > sequence so that we can be sure the mmc card detection scans are
> > complete before attempting to use an mmc device as a root device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
>
> NAK. This is still hackish and not a reliable, controlled way of handling the
> issue of rootfs on removable media.
What exactly makes this unreliable? This is done almost exactly the
same way for SCSI. See drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.c.
> For reference, how is this handled in USB (which is conceptually identical)? The
> normal case for removable media is usually an initrd that can wait for hotplug
> events.
I don't know about USB, but root=/dev/mmcblk0p1 used to work before
2.6.20 and it doesn't work anymore. Doesn't that make this a regression?
Haavard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 10:35 Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-05-10 12:04 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-05-10 12:37 ` Haavard Skinnemoen [this message]
2007-05-10 13:45 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-05-10 14:33 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-05-10 15:58 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-05-10 16:27 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-05-10 17:51 ` Matt Reimer
2007-05-11 7:44 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-05-10 19:41 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-05-11 8:39 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-05-13 13:34 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-05-13 13:47 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-05-13 14:24 ` Pierre Ossman
2007-05-13 14:37 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070510143737.54969394@dhcp-252-105.norway.atmel.com \
--to=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®