mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] revert "cancel_delayed_work: use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync()"
@ 2007-05-17 19:25 Oleg Nesterov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2007-05-17 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Jarek Poplawski, David Howells, linux-kernel

As pointed out by Jarek Poplawski, the patch

	[WORKQUEUE]: cancel_delayed_work: use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync()
	commit: 071b638689464c6b39407025eedd810d5b5e6f5d

was wrong, it was merged by mistake after that.

>From the changelog:

	after this patch:
		...
		delayed_work_timer_fn->__queue_work() in progress.

		The latter doesn't differ from the caller's POV,

it does make a difference if the caller calls flush_workqueue() after
cancel_delayed_work(), in that case flush_workqueue() can miss this
work_struct.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- t/include/linux/workqueue.h~	2007-05-17 22:55:59.000000000 +0400
+++ t/include/linux/workqueue.h	2007-05-17 23:03:03.000000000 +0400
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static inline int cancel_delayed_work(st
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = del_timer(&work->timer);
+	ret = del_timer_sync(&work->timer);
 	if (ret)
 		work_clear_pending(&work->work);
 	return ret;


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-05-17 19:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-17 19:25 [PATCH] revert "cancel_delayed_work: use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync()" Oleg Nesterov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome