* Status of squashfs?
@ 2007-05-22 3:52 Rob Landley
2007-05-22 4:03 ` Roland Dreier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rob Landley @ 2007-05-22 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
So Fedora uses squashfs, Ubuntu uses, squashfs, Gentoo uses squashfs... It
seems like the only place I can get a kernel _without_ squashfs is
kernel.org.
Is there a reason for this?
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of squashfs?
2007-05-22 3:52 Status of squashfs? Rob Landley
@ 2007-05-22 4:03 ` Roland Dreier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roland Dreier @ 2007-05-22 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Landley; +Cc: linux-kernel
> So Fedora uses squashfs, Ubuntu uses, squashfs, Gentoo uses squashfs... It
> seems like the only place I can get a kernel _without_ squashfs is
> kernel.org.
>
> Is there a reason for this?
Has anyone tried to merge it upstream? Do the squashfs developers
want to merge it?
- R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-22 4:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-22 3:52 Status of squashfs? Rob Landley
2007-05-22 4:03 ` Roland Dreier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®