mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Add stack usage monitoring
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:14:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070619131441.01b5ae4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070619195003.GA11718@c2.user-mode-linux.org>

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:50:03 -0400
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:54:22AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:42:45 -0400
> > Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Add a machanism to see how much of a kernel stack is used.  This
> > > allocates zeroed stacks and sees where the lowest non-zero byte is on
> > > process exit.  It keeps track of the lowest value and logs values as
> > > they get lower.
> > > 
> > 
> > remind us again why the generic code is unsuitable?
> 
> It does something different - it will tell you the greatest stack
> usage of any currently running process.  What I want to be able to do
> is run a workload and come back a few days later and see how close
> anything came to running out of stack.

<looks>

wth?  I'm _sure_ we used to have code in there which would, within
do_exit(), work out the maximum amount of kernel stack which a task had
used and if that was max-since-boot, drop a printk.

Maybe I dreamed it, but I don't think so.

I wonder where it went?

Oh well.  Your new code should really be generic, utilising the
stack-page-zeroing which CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE enables.  There's nothing
UML-specific about it.

low_water_lock and lowest_to_date should be static to check_stack_usage(),
btw..


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-19 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-19 18:42 Jeff Dike
2007-06-19 18:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-19 19:50   ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-19 19:57     ` Randy Dunlap
2007-06-20 15:37       ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-19 20:14     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-06-20 14:06       ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2007-06-20 15:17         ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-20 20:20           ` Blaisorblade
2007-06-20 18:23       ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-20 14:18   ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2007-06-20 15:20     ` Jeff Dike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070619131441.01b5ae4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome