From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Add stack usage monitoring
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:14:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070619131441.01b5ae4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070619195003.GA11718@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:50:03 -0400
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:54:22AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:42:45 -0400
> > Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Add a machanism to see how much of a kernel stack is used. This
> > > allocates zeroed stacks and sees where the lowest non-zero byte is on
> > > process exit. It keeps track of the lowest value and logs values as
> > > they get lower.
> > >
> >
> > remind us again why the generic code is unsuitable?
>
> It does something different - it will tell you the greatest stack
> usage of any currently running process. What I want to be able to do
> is run a workload and come back a few days later and see how close
> anything came to running out of stack.
<looks>
wth? I'm _sure_ we used to have code in there which would, within
do_exit(), work out the maximum amount of kernel stack which a task had
used and if that was max-since-boot, drop a printk.
Maybe I dreamed it, but I don't think so.
I wonder where it went?
Oh well. Your new code should really be generic, utilising the
stack-page-zeroing which CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE enables. There's nothing
UML-specific about it.
low_water_lock and lowest_to_date should be static to check_stack_usage(),
btw..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-19 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-19 18:42 Jeff Dike
2007-06-19 18:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-19 19:50 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-19 19:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-06-20 15:37 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-19 20:14 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-06-20 14:06 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2007-06-20 15:17 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-20 20:20 ` Blaisorblade
2007-06-20 18:23 ` Jeff Dike
2007-06-20 14:18 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2007-06-20 15:20 ` Jeff Dike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070619131441.01b5ae4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome