* 2.6.22 vs amanda, 2.6.22 1, amanda 0
@ 2007-07-10 12:45 Gene Heskett
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2007-07-10 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Greetings;
Running 2.6.22 with no other patches last night, something went south in my
amanda backup run, and so far my forensics are coming up empty. The only
obvious thing is that an amdump.1 file was not generated, and when I awoke
this am, cupsd was stuck and using 70+% of the cpu, and there were several
amanda related procs apparently waiting on it. I restarted cups which will
normally unjam the jobs and complete any pending, but none were pending even
before I restarted cups. After the cups restart, the amanda related stuff
went away and the cpu cooled down by 15 degrees.
The expected files were written to the tape however.
I will now reboot to 2.6.22-ck1 as the scheduler performance with a plain .22
is back to normal, with kmail being hung for 30 seconds at a time. This is
not acceptable performance for a desktop even with full pre-emption checked
in the build config.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and
car keys to teenage boys.
-- P.J. O'Rourke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-07-10 12:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-10 12:45 2.6.22 vs amanda, 2.6.22 1, amanda 0 Gene Heskett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome