* [PATCH 05/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/cris
@ 2007-07-27 9:44 Yoann Padioleau
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Yoann Padioleau @ 2007-07-27 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel-janitors; +Cc: starvik, dev-etrax, akpm, linux-kernel
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: starvik@axis.com
Cc: dev-etrax@axis.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
---
fault.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/cris/mm/fault.c b/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
index 8672ab7..d5b1e3d 100644
--- a/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/cris/mm/fault.c
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ find_fixup_code(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
- if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs))) != 0) {
+ if ((fixup = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs))) != NULL) {
/* Adjust the instruction pointer in the stackframe. */
instruction_pointer(regs) = fixup->fixup;
arch_fixup(regs);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-07-27 9:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-27 9:44 [PATCH 05/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/cris Yoann Padioleau
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®