From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: about modularization
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:59:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070803185954.GB20580@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B36A43.6030101@gmail.com>
* Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/03/2007 03:19 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > One of the authors of the IO scheduler code said it on lkml recently
> > that while modularization of IO scheduler had advantages too, in
> > retrospect he wishes they would not have made IO schedulers modular
> > and now that decision cannot be undone.
>
> Just as a matter of interest -- why can't it? (a pointer to a list
> archive if you have one, or a name so I can look for it myself if you
> don't, will do as answer).
some apps depend on AS, some on CFQ, and once you expose something to
users it's _very_ hard to remove it, even if the technical arguments are
strong.
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2007/04/16/23
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-03 12:07 Scheduler Situation T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 12:31 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-08-03 12:52 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
[not found] ` <192840a00708030616g22d9dd16o95b2620bfe3347a8@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-03 13:27 ` Андрій Мішковський
2007-08-03 13:45 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-08-03 13:00 ` debian developer
2007-08-03 15:28 ` about modularization Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <cdc89fe60708030651s54b5f0e0j938450632cf621c5@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-03 13:52 ` Fwd: " T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 15:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 17:47 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-03 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-09-01 22:02 ` Oleg Verych
[not found] ` <200708031354.15485.alistair@devzero.co.uk>
[not found] ` <cdc89fe60708030712q391de609o3999a870ea7cbcbd@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <200708031540.29687.alistair@devzero.co.uk>
2007-08-03 14:51 ` Scheduler Situation T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 15:05 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-08-06 20:20 about modularization Mitchell Erblich
2007-08-06 20:50 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-06 21:48 Mitchell Erblich
2007-08-06 23:35 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-06 23:45 ` Rene Herman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070803185954.GB20580@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rene.herman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®