From: Oleksandr Natalenko <pfactum@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler Situation
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:52:15 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20070803T144718-943@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdc89fe60708030507r29283942mbb9947edbe04e23a@mail.gmail.com>
T. J. Brumfield <enderandrew <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 1 - Can someone please explain why the kernel can be modular in every
> other aspect, including offering a choice of IO schedulers, but not
> kernel schedulers?
IMHO, Linus has a grudge against Con, but I can't understand, why. Con has
written nice code, I use it even now, I'm glad to have nice high-interactive
system on desktop. But "a grudge" is not an argument for Linus, it's better not
to make a decision by himself, but to let the community to decide, what is
better - CFS or SD.
Question is not only in CFS vs SD, but in -ck patchset. Linus must remember
that he has lost nice code and nice maintainer, and it's not a right decision.
Linux is a public OS, so let people decide themselves, but not Linus himself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-03 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-03 12:07 T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 12:31 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-08-03 12:52 ` Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
[not found] ` <192840a00708030616g22d9dd16o95b2620bfe3347a8@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-03 13:27 ` Андрій Мішковський
2007-08-03 13:45 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-08-03 13:00 ` debian developer
2007-08-03 15:28 ` about modularization Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <cdc89fe60708030651s54b5f0e0j938450632cf621c5@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-03 13:52 ` Fwd: " T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 15:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 15:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 17:47 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-03 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-01 22:02 ` Oleg Verych
[not found] ` <200708031354.15485.alistair@devzero.co.uk>
[not found] ` <cdc89fe60708030712q391de609o3999a870ea7cbcbd@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <200708031540.29687.alistair@devzero.co.uk>
2007-08-03 14:51 ` Scheduler Situation T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 15:05 ` Alistair John Strachan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20070803T144718-943@post.gmane.org \
--to=pfactum@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®