Re: sdio: parameterize SDIO FBR register defines

[Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>]

On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:14:03 +0100
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com> wrote:

> 
> I really don't follow you objection to this.  If one is maintaining
> the SDIO core then I would expect some familiarity with the spec and
> an understanding the FBRs are per-function but contained in the same
> CCCR/F0 register space.
> 

If we can reduce that barrier, then I think we should. People can't be
expected to keep everything fresh in memory all the time. And we won't
have a team dedicated to hacking this all the time.

> Also, I would consider the start of the CCCR as the "base address".
> 

In some sense, but there are also several identical FBR chunks on the
card. So by most definitions of a base address, the start of each chunk
would be it.

> > Would you be content with replacing "func->num * 0x100" with a
> > macro so that the code becomes something like:
> > 
> > 	SDIO_FBR_BASE(func->num) + SDIO_FBR_STD_IF
> 
> I think this is less readable than SDIO_FBR_STD_IF(func->num).
> 

It's subjective. But the longer version is more understandable for
someone who doesn't have the details of the SDIO protocol fresh in his
mind.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org