From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Javier Pello <javier.pello@urjc.es>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] request_firmware: skip timeout if userspace was not notified
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 16:26:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070807162618.3814ff78@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B87ACA.7010501@urjc.es>
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:59:38 +0200,
Javier Pello <javier.pello@urjc.es> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> > If you don't have modules and the initial request fails, how do you
> > load the firmware later?
>
> I trigger a rebinding of the device to the driver in an init file:
> # echo -n [device] >/sys/.../bind
So it is indeed that this driver wants to fail its probe if it cannot
get the firmware. A possibilty to achieve a similar effect would be to
use request_firmware_nowait() and to call device_release_driver() from
the callback if no firmware is loaded. (This would imply a split of
that driver's probe function into two stages.)
>
> > The real fix would be to change the driver not to block in the
> > firmware request and use async version of firmware loading. The
> > whole firmware class with its silly timeout is just a piece of
> > crap, that needs to be replaced.
>
> I don't think that would be a real fix. You've done away with the
> kernel blocking, but the timeout is still there, only that in the
> background, and my point is still true: it is useless to wait at
> all if userspace didn't receive the event. Waiting asynchronously
> is less annoying than waiting synchronously, but equally useless.
Well, at least it doesn't block the whole probing process... although
this waiting is indeed useless.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-07 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-03 19:07 Javier Pello
2007-08-04 5:21 ` david
2007-08-04 8:50 ` Javier Pello
2007-08-04 17:09 ` david
2007-08-04 21:20 ` Javier Pello
2007-08-06 12:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-08-06 20:23 ` Javier Pello
[not found] ` <20070807125844.4d756b04@gondo lin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
2007-08-07 10:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-08-07 11:46 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-07 12:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-08-07 12:31 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-07 12:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-08-07 12:47 ` Javier Pello
2007-08-07 12:57 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-07 13:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-08-07 13:59 ` Javier Pello
2007-08-07 14:08 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-07 14:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-08-09 9:13 ` Javier Pello
2007-08-09 9:21 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-09 9:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-08-07 14:26 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2007-08-09 9:36 ` Javier Pello
2007-08-09 11:58 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-10 21:24 ` Javier Pello
2007-08-11 13:26 ` Kay Sievers
2007-08-07 20:05 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070807162618.3814ff78@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=javier.pello@urjc.es \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®