mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@earthlink.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question: RT schedular : task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) : decreases overhead when  rq->nr_running == 1
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:34:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070808123418.GA30248@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000501c7d945$f30af1a0$6501a8c0@earthlink.net>


* Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@earthlink.net> wrote:

> After
>     p->time_slice = static_prio_timeslice(p->static_prio);
> 
> Why isn't their a check like
>     if  (rq->nr_running == 1)
>          return;
> 
> Which world remove the need for any recheduling or requeue'ing...

your change is a possible optimization, but this is a pretty rare 
codepath because the overwhelming majority of RT apps uses SCHED_FIFO. 
Plus, the time_slice going down to 0 is a relatively rare event even for 
SCHED_RR tasks. And if we have only a single SCHED_RR task, why is it 
SCHED_RR to begin with? So this is on several levels an uncommon 
workload and by adding a check like that we'd increase the codesize. But 
... no strong feelings against this optimization - if you send a proper 
patch we can apply it, it certainly makes sense from a logic POV.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-08 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-07 22:54 Mitchell Erblich
2007-08-08 12:34 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-08-09  8:11   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-08-09  8:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-09  8:36       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-09  8:39         ` Dmitry Adamushko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070808123418.GA30248@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=erblichs@earthlink.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®